Electric field and gaussian surface

AI Thread Summary
The electric field within the small copper BB is zero for radii r<a, as is the electric field inside the hollow copper shell for radii b<r<R, due to the properties of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium. According to Gauss's Law, the total electric flux through a closed Gaussian surface within the conductor is also zero, indicating that any charge must reside on the inside surface of the spherical shell. Since the small BB has a charge of +q, the inner surface of the shell must have a charge of -q to maintain overall neutrality. Consequently, the outer surface of the copper shell must have a charge of +q to ensure that the total charge remains zero. Understanding these principles is essential for analyzing electric fields and charges in conductive materials.
PinkFlamingo
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
A small copper spherical BB of radius a is located at the center of a larer hollow copper spherical shell of inner radius b and outer radius R. A charge of +q is on the small BB. The hollow copper shell has zero charge on it.

a) What is the electric field within the BB (for radii r<a)?

b) What is the electric field inside the copper shell (for radii that stisfy b<r<R)

c) Draw a closed Gaussian surface within the copper of the shell. What is the total flux of the electric vector through this Gaussian surgace? This result implies that charge must lie on the inside surface of the spherical shell. What charge must reside on the inside surgface of the copper shell? Since the copper shell has a total charge of zero, what charge must reside on the outer surface of the copper shell?

Please help me!

So far all I've been able to figure out is that the answer to b is 0 I think?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
These questions require you to know two things:
(1) The electrostatic field within a conductor is zero
(2) Gauss's Law, which relates the total electric flux through a closed surface to the charge within that surface

Can you state Gauss's Law? How do you apply it?
 
Would the answer to a AND b be 0 because they're both within the conductor?
 
PinkFlamingo said:
Would the answer to a AND b be 0 because they're both within the conductor?
Yes. The field within both conductors is zero.
 
Would the answer to c be 0 as well, since the total charge is 0, the flux must be 0 too right?
 
PinkFlamingo said:
Would the answer to c be 0 as well, since the total charge is 0, the flux must be 0 too right?
See my comments:
c) Draw a closed Gaussian surface within the copper of the shell. What is the total flux of the electric vector through this Gaussian surgace?
Since it's within a conductor, the field and flux must be zero.
This result implies that charge must lie on the inside surface of the spherical shell. What charge must reside on the inside surgface of the copper shell?
So what charge must lie on the inside surface? Remember: Total charge within the Gaussian surface must be zero.
Since the copper shell has a total charge of zero, what charge must reside on the outer surface of the copper shell?
The charge on the inner surface plus the charge on the outer surface must add to zero. Figure it out.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top