Electric field at a point (point charge and semi-circle rod)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the electric fields at point C due to a uniformly charged semicircular rod and a negative point charge. It is suggested that the magnitude of the electric field from the point charge (Ep) is greater than that from the rod (Er), as the rod's charge can be treated as a series of point charges contributing to the overall field. The net electric field at point C is debated, with some arguing it equals Ep due to the alignment of electric field lines, while others emphasize that all segments of the rod contribute to the net field. Clarification is sought regarding the term "fractional charge," with suggestions that it refers to continuously distributed charge rather than a simple fraction of Q. The conversation concludes with a recommendation to derive an integral for the total electric field produced by the rod at point C.
AnonBae
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin semicircular rod has a total charge +Q uniformly distributed along it. A negative point charge -Q is placed as shown. (Point C is equidistant from -Q and from all points on the rod.)
*Image Attached*
Let Ep and Er represent the electric fields at point C due to the point charge and the rod respectively.

a) Is the magnitude of Ep greater than, less than, or equal to the magnitude of Er? Explain.

b) Is the magnitude of the net electric field at point C greater than, lessthan, or equal to the magnitude of Ep? Explain.

Homework Equations


ΣE = Fe / q

The Attempt at a Solution


a. I am guessing the magnitude of Ep is greater than the magnitude of Er since we can treat a segment charge on the rod as a point charge, and thus the by the equation, the electric field is dependent on the charge. The fractional charge on the rod will produce a greater electrical force than the point charge does.
b. The magnitude of the net electric field is equal to the magnitude at Ep since the point C lies on the electric field line between point C and the fractional charge on the rod.
 

Attachments

  • Charge and rod.PNG
    Charge and rod.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 1,130
Physics news on Phys.org
AnonBae said:
we can treat a segment charge on the rod as a point charge
In what sense, placed where, and of what magnitude?
AnonBae said:
The fractional charge on the rod
Why fractional?

For b, I don't think you are reading the question correctly.
 
a. I do know that a fractional charge of +Q contributes to the electric field at point C since no other electric field lines cross through point C besides the one horizontal to point C. I am confused as to whether that fractional charge offsets its weak electric force by the formula for the electric field or it does not.

b. So, the net electric field is contributed by all charges on the rod (total of +Q) and the sum of the electric field from all those charges will equal the electric field Ep since they both converge at the same point?
 
AnonBae said:
fractional charge of +Q contributes to the electric field at point C
I still don't know what you mean by a fractional charge here. Do you mean a continuously distributed charge? Or one infinitesimal element of the distributed charge? Or just some fraction less than 1 of Q?
AnonBae said:
no other electric field lines cross through point C besides the one horizontal to point C.
Except for the extreme ends, all parts of the rod generate a field which has a horizontal component at C.
Write an integral for the total field the rod produces at C.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top