Electric Field Intensity at a point due to a infinite line charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field intensity at point P(0,3,4) due to infinite uniform line charges along the x and y axes. The relevant equation for electric field due to a line charge is provided, emphasizing the need for radial distance and unit vector direction. Participants clarify that while Gauss's law could be used, it's not necessary for this problem, and the electric field can be determined by considering contributions from both axes individually. It is confirmed that the field at the specified point will yield a constant value, despite being dependent on the z-coordinate. The conclusion emphasizes that the method of calculation does not affect the final result at point P.
Abel I Daniel
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Infinite uniform line charges of 5nc/m lie along the (positive and negative) x and y axes in free space.
Find E at :P(0,3,4)

Homework Equations


E due to line charge along the Z-axis is given by:
E=(λ/(2∏*ε*r))*ar
where λ=line charge density;ε= permitivity;r=radial distance of point from the line charge;ar=unit vector along the direction of E.


The Attempt at a Solution


Here the line charge lies in z=0 plane right??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Abel I Daniel said:
Here the line charge lies in z=0 plane right??

Yes. Is that all you wanted to know?
 
Use Gauss + superposition.
 
ok,but I am trying to do without the help of Gauss law..
 
so,does it require to take both the cases(along x-axis and y-axis)individually and finally add them ??
If that is the method,we will get an expression of function of x and y(instead of a constant value) right?
 
Abel I Daniel said:
so,does it require to take both the cases(along x-axis and y-axis)individually and finally add them ??
If that is the method,we will get an expression of function of x and y(instead of a constant value) right?

No.
When evaluated at (0,3,4) it will be a constant. The method is immaterial to the answer.

Of course, the field at P(x0, y0, z0) is a function of z0 but not of x0 or y0.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top