Electric field of a dipole, two different equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the two different equations for the electric field of a dipole. The first equation presented is E = k p [2cos θ r + sin θ θ]/(r^3), while the second is E = k[3(p·r) r - p]/(r^3). Participants explore how to convert the first equation into the second, suggesting that using the relationship between unit vectors and trigonometric terms may be key. A geometric relationship is highlighted, showing that z can be expressed in terms of r and θ, facilitating the conversion. Understanding these equations is crucial for accurately describing the electric field generated by dipoles.
gareth182
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Electric field of a dipole, two different equations??

Hi,

I've been taught in uni how to derive the electric field of a dipole to be

E= k p [2cos theta r(hat) + sin theta theta(hat)]/(r^3)

where k=1/(4pi e0), p=qd= dipole moment, (hat) terms are unit vectors and r is the distance between the halfway point of the dipole and the point of observation.

However, on most internet pages the electric field is expressed as

E= k[3(p.r(hat))r(hat) - p]/(r^3)

can anyone help me convert the first electric field equation to the second?

I'm guessing it may involve using r(hat)=r/r to convert the trigonometric terms back to dot products...
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Sorry, I've got to use underlines instead of hats to denote unit vectors. The two expressions you have are

(1) E = kp[2 cos θ r + sin θ θ]/r3 and
(2) E = kp[3 (z·r) r - z]/r3 = kp[3 cos θ r - z]/r3

Geometry tells us that z = cos θ r - sin θ θ, so plug that in (2) and you get (1).
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top