Electric fields, magnetic fields and Lorentz frames

AI Thread Summary
To prove that electric field (E) and magnetic field (B) are perpendicular in all Lorentz frames if they are perpendicular in one, one can contract the electromagnetic field tensor F with its dual. The dual tensor is defined as {\cal F}_{\mu\nu}=\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F^{\rho\sigma}. Forming the scalar {\cal F}_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu} will yield a result proportional to the dot product E·B. This approach demonstrates that the relationship between E and B is Lorentz invariant. Understanding these tensor relationships is crucial for tackling the problem effectively.
golfingboy07
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Not sure how to go about proving that if E and B are perpendicular in one Lorentz frame they are perpendicular in all Lorentz frames.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Contract the tensor F with its dual. This will show that E.B is a Lorentz invariant.
 
ok. would you be able to start me off though?
 
Do you know the tensor F in terms of E and B?
If you don't know that much, you can't start the problem.
Go back to the textbook.
 
yes i know what the F tensor is in terms of the components of E and B
 
Last edited:
Find the dual tensor
{\cal F}_{\mu\nu}=\epsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}F^{\rho\sigma}.
Then form the scalar
{\cal F}_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}.
This will be proportional to {\bf E\cdot B}.
My latex didn't work, so try to read the above. Sorry.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top