Electric Potential: x,y,z Components & Zero Points

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field components from the given electric potential V(x,y,z) = Axy - Bx^5 + Cy, the electric field E can be calculated using the formula E = -∇V. The gradient operator ∇ in Cartesian coordinates involves taking partial derivatives of V with respect to x, y, and z. Specifically, the components are derived as Ex = -∂V/∂x, Ey = -∂V/∂y, and Ez = -∂V/∂z. Additionally, the points where the electric field equals zero can be determined by solving the equations obtained from these derivatives.
sbe07phy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) In a certain region of space, the electric potential is V(x,y,z) = Axy - Bx^5 + Cy where A, B, and C are positive constants. Calculate the x, y , and z components of the electric field. Use A, B, C, x, y, and z as necessary
b) At which points is the electric field equal to zero.

Any help?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can't you do? It's hard to help if you don't say what's actually holding you back. Do you know how to calculate the electric field from the potential?
 
How to get started. Do I just solve for each variable with that equation?
 
The equation for getting the electric field from the potential is \mathbf{E} = \boldsymbol{\nabla}V. Did you already know that?
 
Allow me to expand on what genneth started..

he is correct...E= - Del V
where del is the gradiate operator.
You have V in cartesian.

so del V = x(hat)*dV/dx+y(hat)*dV/dy+z(hat)*dV/dz
You textbook should give the relationship for del V, don't forget the negative sign.

So take the derivate of V with respect to x, then repeat for y and z.

This should get you going. If I am wrong, I apologize, but that is how I did a similar problem in my homework.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top