Electromagnetic interactions & photon transfer

werunom
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hello.

One confusion regarding the explanation of electromagnetic [EM] interactions through photons.

Conisder the water jug example given in this wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction#Electromagnetism".
It says - "if we place two such jugs a meter apart, the electrons in one of the jugs repel those in the other jug..."

So with respect to this example, can I say that each electron in one jug does photon exchange with the each of the electrons in the same jug and in the other jug to have the repulsive EM interaction?

I have this confusion because =

1] This way of explaining the EM interaction gives an interpretation that a charged particle exchanges countless photons at any point.
Am I right? Or at least give the right picture please.

2] It is said that EM interaction is of infinite range. And if that is the case, an electron in one jug should be interacting with another charged particle in a distant star. And if that is the case, then every charged particle in this universe should be interacting with every other charged particle.
It may be that -
2.1) all these interactions may cancel out - push pull getting cancelled.
2.2) the interactions themselves may be weak.

Is my understanding correct?
Let me know if I have erred somewhere.

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it that the notion of 'virtual photons' came into picture because of attempting to explain these interactions through pertubation theory?
And is that why this explanation of interactions through photons are just for simple examples and cannot accommodate for explaining the reality, i.e. an electron interacting with the rest of the charged particles in the universe?
 
Requesting someone to clarify this.

Thanks.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top