[Electromagnetism] Force on a moving charge expression

AI Thread Summary
The total force on a moving charge is expressed as F = q(E + v × B), where E is the electric field and B is the magnetic field. To derive the force expression using scalar and vector potentials, the relationship between the electric field and the potentials must be established, specifically E = -∂A/∂t - ∇φ. The discussion highlights the need to differentiate between the partial and convective derivatives of the vector potential A. The final expression for the force incorporates the convective derivative of A, leading to F = q[-∇φ - (∂t + (v · ∇))A + ∇(A · v)]. This clarification resolves the initial confusion regarding the derivatives involved in the force calculation.
carlosbgois
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
The total force on a moving charge q with velocity v is given by \mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}) Using the scalar and vector potentials, show that \mathbf{F}=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})]

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
(2) \mathbf{B}=\nabla\times\mathbf{A}
(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)

The Attempt at a Solution



\mathbf{F}=q(\mathbf{E}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B})=q[-\nabla\phi-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}+\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}]

Now I need to show that

\mathbf{v}\times\mathbf{B}=\nabla(\mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{v})

I tried applying (3) but didn't know where to go from there.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
carlosbgois said:

Homework Equations


[/B]
(1) \mathbf{E}=-\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}-\nabla\phi
Here, the time derivative should be a partial derivative ##\frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## at a fixed point of space. But in the final expression that you want to get to for the force, the derivative is the "convective" time derivative ##\frac{d\mathbf{A}}{dt}## ; i.e., it denotes the rate of change of ##\mathbf{A}## as you move along with the particle. You will need to relate the two types of derivatives. See http://www.continuummechanics.org/cm/materialderivative.html

(3) \mathbf{v}\times(\nabla\times\mathbf{A})=\nabla(\mathbf{v}\cdot\mathbf{A})-\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v}\cdot\nabla)
The last term is not quite written correctly. In your way of writing it, the Del operator has nothing to act upon.
 
Last edited:
As TSny said \mathbf{E}=-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} nowusing the triple product identity:
\mathbf{v}\times(\nabla \times \mathbf{A}) = \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla)
Which in the Lorentz equation:
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - \partial_t \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v}) - \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \right]
or
\mathbf{F} = q \left[-\nabla \phi - [\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ] \mathbf{A} + \nabla(\mathbf{A} \cdot \mathbf{v})\right]
where the term in the square bracket acting on \mathbf{A} is called the convective derivative, viz. (\partial_t + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) ) \mathbf{A} = \frac{d \mathbf{A}}{dt} as required.
 
Got it! Thank you all.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top