Electron launched at an angle in a parallel plate field.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the calculations for an electron launched at an angle in a parallel plate electric field. The user correctly calculated the time of flight and acceleration but struggled with the application of the kinematic equation for vertical motion, specifically misapplying the formula by omitting the 1/2 factor. Participants emphasized the importance of verifying values for charge-to-mass ratio and ensuring all algebra is performed before inputting numerical values. Ultimately, the user acknowledged the mistake in the equation and corrected it, leading to a resolution of the problem. Accurate calculations and attention to detail are crucial in physics problems involving electric fields and motion.
Esoremada
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://puu.sh/6i6HY.png

Homework Equations



Fe = q*Ee

The Attempt at a Solution



a)
dx = vx*t
0.0682 = 4.92*106 * cos(68) * t
t = 0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]
= 3.70036*10-8 seconds

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2
0 = 0 + 4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) + a * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2
a = -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2
= -1.23278 * 1014 m/s2

mass of electron = 9.10938291 * 10-31 kg
charge of electron = 1.60217657 * 10-19 C

Fe = ma
= 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ]

Ee * q = Fe
Ee * 1.60217657 * 10-19 = 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ]
Ee = 9.10938291 * 10-31 * [ -4.92*106 * [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]] * sin(68) / [0.0682 / [4.92*106 * cos(68)]]2 ] / (1.60217657 * 10-19)I got part b correct, so I must have the correct acceleration - now I can't figure out where I'm going wrong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Check your reasoning ...
Also: Remember your ballistics?

If you have the acceleration right, then E=a(m/q)
If that gives the wrong E then (a) you have used a bad value for q/m for an electron - maybe a rounding error? or (b) you didn;t get the right acceleration and the correctness of the answer to part b is a fluke.

Best practice is to do all the algebra before putting the numbers in.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Esoremada said:

Homework Statement



http://puu.sh/6i6HY.png

Homework Equations



Fe = q*Ee

The Attempt at a Solution



a)

d = vt
0.0682 = 4.92*10^6 * cos(68) * t
t = 0.0682 / [4.92*10^6 * cos(68)]
= 3.70036*10^-8

The time of flight is correct if you meant in in seconds.

Esoremada said:
d = di + vt + at^2
0 = 0 + 4.92*10^6 * 3.70036*10^-8 * sin(68) + a * [3.70036*10^-8]^2
a = -4.92*10^6 * 3.70036*10^-8 * sin(68) / [3.70036*10^-8]^2
= -1.23278 * 10^14 m/s^2


Is it the same d as before, when you wrote that d=vt?


The electric field is normal to the capacitor plates. What is the direction of the acceleration? Does the electron accelerate horizontally?

ehild
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
Is it the same d as before, when you wrote that d=vt?


The electric field is normal to the capacitor plates. What is the direction of the acceleration? Does the electron accelerate horizontally?

ehild

No I used horizontal velocity and distance to find time, and then used vertical velocity, distance and time to find acceleration. I'll add subscripts to the OP to make that more clear

Simon Bridge said:
Check your reasoning ...
Also: Remember your ballistics?

If you have the acceleration right, then E=a(m/q)
If that gives the wrong E then (a) you have used a bad value for q/m for an electron - maybe a rounding error? or (b) you didn;t get the right acceleration and the correctness of the answer to part b is a fluke.

Best practice is to do all the algebra before putting the numbers in.

I took the electron values to many more decimals than the homework system checks (3).

I changed all my calculations to not use any previously calculated values and reformatted the exponents. Do you see any specific incorrect logic or calculation now?
 
The equation

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2

is wrong. Check.

ehild
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
ehild said:
The equation

dy = dyi + vy*t + at2

is wrong. Check.

ehild

Oh man, messed up that equation after using it hundreds of times. Thank you very much, that fixed it.

(and I forget the 1/2 both times and the mistakes canceled out which is why I got the right answer for part b :rolleyes:)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top