Electrons - Relativistic velocity addition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the relative speed of two electrons moving at c/2 in perpendicular directions. The initial approach using the Pythagorean theorem for velocity addition is deemed incorrect due to the relativistic speeds involved. Instead, the proper method requires applying the principles of special relativity for accurate results. Participants emphasize the importance of using relativistic velocity addition rather than classical methods. The conversation concludes with a light-hearted exchange about the assignment's progress.
charmedbeauty
Messages
266
Reaction score
0
electrons -- Relativistic velocity addition...

Homework Statement



an observer measures the velocity of two electrons, finding one with a speed c/2 in the x direction and the other c/2 in the y direction. what is the relative speed of the two electrons.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure if this is right it seemed to easy.

but suppose that electron 1 is called b and the other a

then v(b)= √(c2/4+c2/4)
since they are at right angles to each other. is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The velocities are very high, you need to use special relativity here.
 


charmedbeauty said:

Homework Statement



an observer measures the velocity of two electrons, finding one with a speed c/2 in the x direction and the other c/2 in the y direction. what is the relative speed of the two electrons.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Im not sure if this is right it seemed to easy.

but suppose that electron 1 is called b and the other a

then v(b)= √(c2/4+c2/4)
since they are at right angles to each other. is this right?

No. That is a non-relativistic velocity-addition and would give you the right answer for a speeding bullet on Earth but NOT for things traveling at relativistic speeds.

Google relativistic velocity addition
 


voko said:
The velocities are very high, you need to use special relativity here.

phinds said:
No. That is a non-relativistic velocity-addition and would give you the right answer for a speeding bullet on Earth but NOT for things traveling at relativistic speeds.

Google relativistic velocity addition

oh yeah that makes sense ok cool thanks.
 


How did you go with the rest of the assignment =P
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top