Electron's response to a oscillating Electric field.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the motion of an electron subjected to an oscillating electric field, described by the equation x(t) = (a0/ω)t - (a/ω)sin(ωt), where a0 = -eE0/m. The resulting motion exhibits both linear drift and oscillation, which challenges intuitive expectations about charge behavior in electric fields. Participants express confusion about the presence of a linear term alongside the oscillatory component in the position equation. The linear term is attributed to the inertia of the electron, indicating that its initial response to the electric field leads to a drift. This complex behavior highlights the nuanced dynamics of charged particles in varying electric fields.
Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is to find the motion of the electron of charge -e and mass m which is initially at rest and which is suddenly subjected to an electric field E= E0sin(\omegat).

The following mathematical expression is safe and sound but I am having trouble with the Physics involved.x=(a0/\omega)t-(a/\omega)sin(\omegat).

where a0=-eE0/m.

The result x(t) is varying linearly as well as oscillating in time. This means that the electron is responding to the electric field in a manner which jiggling as well as drifting away.

That's against our intuition. A charge should respond in accordance to the electric field. So what is happening here.

My speculation is that the drifting motion is due to the inertia of the electron and that the motion was due to the initial electric field.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Himanshu said:
The problem is to find the motion of the electron of charge -e and mass m which is initially at rest and which is suddenly subjected to an electric field E= E0sin(\omegat).

x=(a0/\omega)t-(a/\omega)sin(\omegat).

where a0=-eE0/m.

The result x(t) is varying linearly as well as oscillating in time. This means that the electron is responding to the electric field in a manner which jiggling as well as drifting away.

That's against our intuition

Hi Himanshu! :smile:

(have an omega: ω :smile:)

Why isn't it just (a0/ω)cos(ωt) ? :confused:
 
I cannot understand. How does the above expression appears? Can you please elaborate.
 
Don't mean to revive an old thread, but the physics behind this situation is confusing me as well. The acceleration is purely sinusoidal, varying with time, but the position somehow has a linear term in there as well as a sine. What's the physical explanation for this?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top