Electrostatic Equilibrium on the x-axis

AI Thread Summary
To achieve electrostatic equilibrium on the x-axis with two negative charges, a positive charge q3 must be positioned where the forces exerted by q1 and q2 on it are equal. The initial assumption of placing q3 between the two charges was reconsidered due to the differing magnitudes of the negative charges. Using Coulomb's law, the forces were expressed in terms of distance, leading to a calculation that resulted in x = 0.571 m. However, there was a concern regarding the proper squaring of denominators in the calculations. The final answer remains uncertain pending verification of the algebraic steps.
kevykevy
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Question - Three charges lie along the x acis as shown below. The negative charge q1 = 25 uC is at x = 2.0 m, the negative charge q2 = 6.0 uC is at the origin. Where must a positive charge q3 be placed on the x-axis such that the resultant force on it is zero?

Answer - I was thinking the third charge (q3) would be in the middle of the other two charges, my only doubt is that that would be too easy of an answer seeing how this is supposed to be harder than the normal homework. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
 
kevykevy said:
After re-reading the question, I realize that the two negative charges are different. So should I place the q3 6/15 away from q2?
Your leaning somewhat in the right direction, but the forces are inversely proportional to the square of the distance betwen charges. Use Coulomb's law to write the forces calling one distance x and the other distance 2m - x and make the magnitudes of the two forces equal.
 
k so I'll have:

(9x10^9)(6x10^-6)(q3)/x = (9x10^9)(1.5x10^-5)(q3)/2 - x

54000(q3)/x = 135000(q3)/2 - x

54000/x = 135000/2 - x

108000/x = 135000/-x

108000(-x) = 135000(x)

How do I solve from there? Did I make an algebraic error?
 
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
 
kevykevy said:
I tried again and found my mistake, so my final answer is:

x = 0.571428571 m

Correct?
I don't know if that is the correct result, but in your previous post the denominators should all have been squared. Did you fix that?
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top