Electrostatic Force and Superposition Principal

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic force on a charge at the origin due to two other charges. The user initially miscalculated the forces and struggled with applying the Superposition Principle correctly, leading to an incorrect total force. They also expressed confusion about determining the angle between the resultant force and the positive X-axis. A participant clarified that the angle can be found using vector geometry, specifically through the tangent function relating the Y and X components of the forces. The user acknowledged their misunderstanding and expressed gratitude for the clarification.
shadowfox745
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three charges are arranged as shown in the figure.

Figure
(Attached Below Could not insert the image, wouldn't work for me)


Find the magnitude of the electrostatic force on the charge at the origin. Answer in units of nN. What is the angle theta betwen the electrostatic force on the charge at the origin and the positive axis. Answer in degrees between -180 and 180 degrees measured from the positive X-axis, with counterclockwise positive.


Homework Equations


Coulombs Constant= 8.98755X10^9 N m^2/C^2
F=k((q'q)/r^2)

The Attempt at a Solution



So what I did was I found the Electrostatic force of the center charge and that of the bottom charge using F=K((q'q)/r^2) and I found it to be -2.115x10^-9 C which comes to be -2.115nC and I used the same equation to solve for the electrostatic Force between the center charge and the charge to the right and that came out to be -7.800x10^-10 C which turns to be .78Nc. I thought the Superposition Principal said to find the electrostatic for exerted to the center is just adding both forces together which gave me -2.895nC however when I inputed it on my online hwk it says it to be incorrect. So am I missing something here? And I also have no clue how to find the angle, and my book shows no example of it so can I get some hints on it.
 

Attachments

  • d98e48bca648.jpg
    d98e48bca648.jpg
    12.8 KB · Views: 463
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind I forgot the most stupidest thing to use vector geometry. Though I am still trying to figure out how to find the angle. Actually I am confused as to what angle they are asking to find.
 
shadowfox745 said:
Nevermind I forgot the most stupidest thing to use vector geometry. Though I am still trying to figure out how to find the angle. Actually I am confused as to what angle they are asking to find.

Each of the forces on the charge at the origin are developing force vectors as you noted. When you add them together - the x component and the y component - you will have a triangle with the x and y components being the perpendicular sides. The angle that it forms with the X axis is what they want. Hence you know that Y / X is equal to tangent theta.
 
Oh, I understand now, got it. Thanks! I guess summer really does a number on my basic skills.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top