Elevator Problem: Find Scale Reading in Falling Elevator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Toxage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elevator
AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where an 80.0 kg person stands on a scale in a falling elevator at a constant speed of 3.5 m/s, the acceleration is zero. Consequently, the net force acting on the person is also zero, leading to the scale reading equal to the person's weight, which is 882 Newtons. However, the discussion reveals confusion about the correct application of formulas when acceleration is involved. It emphasizes the importance of defining a positive direction for acceleration and gravitational force when calculating net force. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in understanding the relationship between speed, acceleration, and scale readings in a falling elevator.
Toxage
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 80.0 kg person stands on a scale in an elevator.
(c) What does it read when the elevator is falling at 3.5 m/s?

Homework Equations



EF = MA

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't even attempt the solution because I don't know acceleration...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toxage said:
A 80.0 kg person stands on a scale in an elevator.
(c) What does it read when the elevator is falling at 3.5 m/s?

I can't even attempt the solution because I don't know acceleration...

Hi Toxage! :smile:

If the speed is constant, then the acceleration is … ? :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Toxage! :smile:

If the speed is constant, then the acceleration is … ? :wink:

Then the acceleration is equal to 0.

EF = MA

EF = M(0)

EF = 0

Fn - Fg = 0

Fn = Fg

80(9.8) = 882 Newtons

882/9.8 = 80kg

Doesn't work... Webassign says its the wrong answer...


Did I do something wrong in my math?
 
No your maths looks fine. What is the quoted answer? If your standing on scales and not accelerating the scales will tell you your weight. When you are accelerating use this formula:

F_{net} = m(a + g)

But MAKE SURE YOU DEFINE A POSITIVE DIRECTION AND STICK TO IT. So if you define up as positive, g = -9.81. And then when accelerating up, a is positive and vice versa.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top