EMF Meters and Ferromagnetic Interference

AI Thread Summary
Using an AC EMF meter to measure electromagnetic fields can be affected by the presence of ferromagnetic materials. These substances may interfere with the readings by altering the electromagnetic field. The exact impact of ferromagnetic materials on the measurements is not definitively established, indicating a need for further experimentation. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the interaction between ferromagnetic substances and electromagnetic fields in physics. Overall, the inquiry reflects a genuine interest in exploring the complexities of electromagnetic measurements.
Stoopchow
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
My interest in physics is relatively new and recently I've been trying to figure out the answer to what is probably a simple question. Here it is; if one is using an AC EMF meter to read the time varying current from a man-made electromagnetic field, will brandishing ferromagnetic substances to the field effect or interfere with it at all? By this I mean, will the reading of the field be weakened by placing attracted substances between the electromagnet itself and the meter? Hopefully someone can help me with this.

Thanks,
Stoop
 
Physics news on Phys.org
stoopchow said:
, will brandishing ferromagnetic substances to the field effect or interfere with it at all?
Yes.
 
Thank you

Thanks very much. That's all I needed to know.
 
Your question is directly indicating that you are interested in physics. Your question is based on experimental facts. No one can directly say that what will happen when ferromagnetic substances brandishing to the field. You are asking a good question and your question is related to http://www.yshield.com.au/emr-testing.html, I’ll also try to find the answer but if anybody knows please put here.
 
Thanks David

Thank you very much David,
This forum is very useful and hopefully your advice will help me to solve my problem, one way or another.
 
Susskind (in The Theoretical Minimum, volume 1, pages 203-205) writes the Lagrangian for the magnetic field as ##L=\frac m 2(\dot x^2+\dot y^2 + \dot z^2)+ \frac e c (\dot x A_x +\dot y A_y +\dot z A_z)## and then calculates ##\dot p_x =ma_x + \frac e c \frac d {dt} A_x=ma_x + \frac e c(\frac {\partial A_x} {\partial x}\dot x + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial y}\dot y + \frac {\partial A_x} {\partial z}\dot z)##. I have problems with the last step. I might have written ##\frac {dA_x} {dt}...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top