Energy Conservation in an expanded 1D box

dLo R6
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am fairly new to QM and am learning many of the basics right now. We were just discussing conservation of operators (energy, momentum, etc) and I recalled a problem proposed in my textbook about a 1D particle in a box of length L. at a time t, the box suddenly expands to t=2L, in which time the wavefunction does not have time respond. it asked if energy (more specifically, <H>) was conserved during the time that the wall moves.

i'm assuming that the laws of conservation aren't broken and that the Hamiltonian does not change. but then does the fact that the box expanded at a specific time, mean that then the potential V(x) is now a function of time? so then is energy is not conserved since I have to consider the potential in the Hamiltonian now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK now I'm assuming that since the box changes, the potential does change and thus <H> is not equal to <H'>. Is this correct?
 
That's correct. An external force moved the wall, doing work on the system, so the energy of the system is not conserved.
 
Yes, technically your potential is now a function of time, but you don't want to solve the time-dependent schrodinger equation. Because the wavefunction dosen't change, Your old wavefunction is a superposition of your new set of wavefuncitons describing your new ISW potential.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top