Energy levels of a 3 dimensional infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation emitted during an electron transition from the third energy level (E3) to the lowest energy level (E1) in a three-dimensional infinite square well. The energy level equation is provided, and clarification is sought regarding the quantum numbers for E3. It is confirmed that for E3, the values can be (1, 2, 2) or any permutation of these, as energy levels are degenerate in a symmetric box. The conversation also suggests exploring rectangular/square wells for a deeper understanding of the topic. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the emitted wavelength.
bobred
Messages
170
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate the wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation emitted when
an electron makes a transition from the third energy level, E3, to the lowest energy level, E1.

Homework Equations



E_n = \frac{\left (n_{x}^{2}+n_{y}^{2}+n_{z}^{2} \right) \pi^{2} \hbar^{2}}{2m_{e}L^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution


Working out the wavelength is not a problem, my problem comes for the values of n for the third level. For the lowest energy level we have

(1^{2} + 1^{2} + 1^{2})

My question is for the third energy level is it

(1^{2} + 2^{2} + 2^{2})?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yep, as long as they are referring to E3 and not the third excited state in the problem,(E1 is the ground state the way you asked the question). And for your interest you are dealing with a symmetric box so the energy levels are degenerate. Meaning you could take 2,2,1 1,2,2 or 2,1,2. E2 would be 2,1,1, 1,2,1 or 1,1,2. These are called degenerate eigenstates.
 
Thanks that's what I thought.
 
No problem, I recommend you look into rectangular/square wells to refine your understanding.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top