Energy loss, stopping power equation,

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the energy loss of electrons before reaching a detector, the stopping power equation, defined as -dE/dx, must be integrated over the total distance. The correct formulation for energy loss is Energy loss = ∫(-dE/dx)dx, which requires specifying the variable of integration. The stopping power is influenced by the particle's energy and the medium it traverses, necessitating a specific model for accurate calculations. Clarification on integrating the stopping power helps confirm that the change in energy can be derived from the differential equation. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
m3h
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to estimate the energy loss of electrons before they reach a detector, but I am unsure how to do it. I think I am supposed to integrate the stopping power function over the total distance but I can't solve the equation...

Homework Equations



Stopping power=-dE/dx

Energy loss=∫-dE/dx (I think)

The Attempt at a Solution



Is the solution - e*x?

Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m3h said:
Stopping power=-dE/dx

Energy loss=∫-dE/dx (I think)
That is the stopping power, but for the energy loss, you've forgotten to write dx, to show what variable you are integrating over. And about the solution, the stopping power will depend on the energy of the particle, and the medium its going through, etc, so you'll need to use a particular model to find a solution. This might be useful: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stopping_power_(particle_radiation )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes. that's the article I first looked at, specifically "The deposited energy can be obtained by integrating the stopping power over the entire path length of the ion when it moves in the solid."

When you said I needed to add dx, did you mean I should write ∫(dE/dx)dx? Doesn't dx disappear then?

Shouldn't it be enough to solve the diff equation above?
 
m3h said:
When you said I needed to add dx, did you mean I should write ∫(dE/dx)dx? Doesn't dx disappear then?

Shouldn't it be enough to solve the diff equation above?

Yes, you should write it like that. The idea is that you know something about dE/dx, so then you integrate it to get the change in energy.
And you're right that you could make the dx disappear, which just tells us that the change in energy is equal to the change in energy (as we would expect).
 
Ok, thank you. I think I know what to do now.

Thanks for the help!
 
yep, glad if I've helped a bit
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top