Equation check: Dimensional analysis.

AI Thread Summary
The equation D = 17.87 √[3]{d/f²} is intended to describe the relationship between resonant frequencies in a spherical cavity but raises concerns regarding dimensional consistency. The left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) dimensions do not match, particularly due to the frequency term introducing an incorrect dimension of T²/³. A proposed correction includes adding a speed of sound term, suggesting the equation should be D = 17.87 √[3]{dC²/f²}. While there is speculation about the author's assumptions regarding units, the discussion indicates that the original equation may not be ideally expressed but could still be valid under specific conditions. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of dimensional analysis in verifying the accuracy of physical equations.
Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
I came across this equation, said to describe the relation between the resonant frequencies of air in a spherical cavity open at the top.

D = 17.87 \sqrt[3]{\frac{d}{f^{2}}}

Where D is the sphere diameter, d is the diameter of a small circular cavity at the top of the sphere and f is the resonant frequency.

Is it me or is this equation wrong?

The dimensions do not seem to check out. The frequency term introduces a dimension of T^{2/3} to the RHS which is not balanced on the LHS.

I would guess that a term with units of speed squared should be added to the numerator inside the cube-root. That would add dimensions of L^{2/3} T^{-2/3}. I would also suspect that this speed of be the speed of sound in the air (C).

i.e. I think the equation should be:

D = 17.87 \sqrt[3]{\frac{dC^{2}}{f^{2}}}

Can anyone tell me if I'm right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your argument makes sense, but it is possible that the author presumed/specified certain units to be used and has incorporated a standard value for the speed of sound in air, based on that assumption of units, into the constant.
 
Thanks for the reply.

No mention of different units that I can see. The author also uses a similar formula for a cavity with a neck and includes a speed of sound term.

To be completely frank, I'm checking a wikipedia article. An error is therefore, not completely unexpected. Though I lack the confidence to be 100% confident in my argument.
 
Beer-monster said:
No mention of different units that I can see.
I didn't say different units, I said specific units. The article specifies metres, and the author may have felt it reasonable to assume that frequency is in cycles/sec. The next equation, where the speed of sound does appear, doesn't have a magic constant. This leads me to suspect the first equation is correct, just not ideally expressed.
I notice that if you write L=d and C=340m/s in the second equation you get something close to the first.
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top