Equilibrium giving me some trouble

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikeman19
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving a uniform plank in equilibrium against a wall. The plank's weight is 420 N, and it rests at a height of 5.21 m, with a critical angle of 70° for stability. To find the coefficient of static friction, the forces acting on the plank must be analyzed, including the weight, normal force, and frictional force. The equilibrium conditions require that the sum of forces and torques equals zero, leading to the conclusion that the maximum static friction coefficient is 0.1. The conversation emphasizes the importance of practice in mastering equilibrium problems in mechanics.
mikeman19
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just got done doing about 20 other problems but I can't figure this one out...

A uniform plank, with a length L of 7.63 m and a weight of 420 N, rests on the ground and against a frictionless roller at the top of a wall of height h = 5.21 m. The plank remains in equilibrium for any value of q= 70° or more, but slips if q < 70. Find the coefficient of static friction between the plank and the ground.

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by identifying all the forces acting on the plank. Draw a diagram.

Then realize that the plank is in equilibrium, so:
∑Fx = 0
∑Fy = 0
∑Torques = 0 (about any point)
 
!

I understand that equilibrium can be tricky, especially when dealing with different angles and forces. It's great that you have been practicing with other problems and I'm sure with some more practice, you will be able to figure this one out as well.

To find the coefficient of static friction, we can use the fact that the plank is in equilibrium. This means that the sum of all the forces acting on the plank must be equal to zero.

First, let's draw a free-body diagram of the plank. We have the weight of the plank acting downwards, and the normal force from the ground acting upwards. We also have a friction force acting parallel to the ground and in the opposite direction of the motion.

Since the plank is in equilibrium, we can set up the following equation:

ΣF = 0

This means that the sum of the forces in the x-direction and the sum of the forces in the y-direction must both equal zero.

In the x-direction, we have the friction force acting in the negative direction, and in the y-direction, we have the normal force acting in the positive direction.

ΣFx = -Ff = 0

ΣFy = N - mg = 0

Solving for the normal force, we get N = mg.

Now, we can use the fact that the plank will slip if q < 70. This means that the friction force must be equal to the maximum static friction force, which is μsN.

Substituting in our equation for N, we get the following:

-Ff = μsN = μsmg

Solving for μs, we get μs = -Ff/mg

Now, we can plug in the values given in the problem:

μs = -Ff/mg = -420/420(9.8) = -0.1

Since the coefficient of friction cannot be negative, we know that the maximum value for μs is 0.1.

I hope this explanation helps you understand how to approach this type of problem. Keep practicing and you will become more comfortable with equilibrium and other mechanics concepts. Good luck!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top