Equilibrium of Three Positively Charged Beads

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the equilibrium position of a third bead between two positively charged beads on an insulating rod. It emphasizes that the specific charge of the third bead is irrelevant for determining its equilibrium position, as the focus is on the balance of forces. Participants suggest working symbolically with variables instead of numerical values to derive the equilibrium location. The equilibrium point is where the net force on the third bead is zero, which can be calculated in terms of the distance d. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the principles of Coulomb's Law in solving such problems.
define_normal
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two small beads having positive charges 3q and q are fixed at the opposite ends of a horizontal, insulating rod, extending from the origin to the point x = d. A third small bead (in the middle) is free to slide on the rod. At what position is the third bead in equilibrium? Can it be stable in equilibrium?


Homework Equations


Coulomb's Law
F = ke (q1q2)/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure how to go about this problem because I don't know the charge of the third bead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
define_normal said:
... I don't know the charge of the third bead.
You don't know any of the values, do you? Work symbollically. That is, just use q's and r's and such, instead of "actual numbers".
 
turin said:
You don't know any of the values, do you? Work symbollically. That is, just use q's and r's and such, instead of "actual numbers".

Hmm. So in order for me to do that, I don't need to know the charge of the third particle?
 
define_normal said:
Hmm. So in order for me to do that, I don't need to know the charge of the third particle?
That's right. You would need to know the charge if you wanted to calculate a non-vanishing force. But, the problem stipulates equilibrium, so it doesn't matter. You are looking for the location where - something, regardless of the amount of charge that is placed there - will calculate to be zero. Even then, you have to calculate this location symbolically (i.e. in terms of d).
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top