Equipartition theorem and molecule of CO

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecule Theorem
fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,929
Reaction score
272
If I understand the equipartition theorem more or less well, if I heat up a gas then the energy I have spent to heat it up should be equally distributed to the rotational part and vibrational part of the molecule dynamics.
Let's take the molecule of CO, I think it has 5 degrees of freedom. 3 vibrationals, 2 rotationals. I don't understand how does the equipartition theorem applies there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vibrationrotationenergy.svg, taken from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotational_spectroscopy#Structure_of_rotational_spectra. It seems that whenever I excitate the molecule, it will gain at least energy in the vibrational form. And if I'm lucky, in the rotational form too. But it seems forbidden to gain energy only in the rotational form. How does this agree with the equipartition theorem?! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equipartition theorem applies only in the classical limit. I.e., when (on average) the molecules are excited to high quantum numbers.
 
EmpaDoc said:
The equipartition theorem applies only in the classical limit. I.e., when (on average) the molecules are excited to high quantum numbers.

Thanks a lot. For some reason I thought it applied for low temperatures/ground states.
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top