Equivalent Resistance in partial parallel/series cicuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the equivalent resistance between points A and B in a circuit with both series and parallel components. Initial attempts to simplify the circuit led to confusion regarding the arrangement of resistors, particularly the placement of a 3-ohm resistor affecting series and parallel combinations. Correct identification of series and parallel relationships is crucial, with emphasis on combining resistors step by step to avoid errors. The final equivalent resistance can be derived by carefully applying the series and parallel resistance formulas. Understanding the configuration of resistors is essential for accurate calculations in circuit analysis.
thatgirlyouknow
Messages
57
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the equivalent resistance between points A and B in the drawing.

Homework Equations



Rseries = R1+R2+R3...
Rparallel: 1/Rp = 1/R1+1/R2+1/R3...


The Attempt at a Solution



Reducing it down:
1/8+1/9 = 1/R1 = 4.235
That's in parallel with 20, so:
1/20+1/4.235 = 3.495 ohms

3, 4, and 6 are in series:
3+4+6 = 13 ohms
Add that to the previous and you have 16.495 ohms, which is incorrect.

Is one parallel and I'm not adding it as such? Or should I combine differently?

Thanks so much!
 

Attachments

  • circuit2.gif
    circuit2.gif
    2 KB · Views: 2,651
Physics news on Phys.org
thatgirlyouknow said:
Reducing it down:
1/8+1/9 = 1/R1 = 4.235
Good. R1 = 4.235 (not 1/R1).
That's in parallel with 20, so:
Nope. The 3 ohm resistor is in the way.
 
So then 20 and 3 are in series, right?
20+3=23 ohms

So now my drawing has:

23 ohms . 4 ohms

4.235 ohms

. 6 ohms

Would the 4 and 6 be considered series?
 
4+6 are in series
9+8 are in parallel
3 and 20 are not in series!

You need to do this step by step...

6+4 = 10
1/8 + 1/9 = 17/72
now you have

------3 -----------
--|--------|------|
-20------17/72--10
--|--------|------|
-------------------

Next you have 17/72 and 10 in parallel.

1/10+72/17 = 737/170

-- -- 3 -------
--|---------|
-20------737/170
--|---------|
--------------

Now the 3 and 737/170 are in series so just add them to get

-------------
--|---------|
-20-------1147/170
--|---------|
-------------

Now these are in parallel you can solve!
 
When you added for 17/72 and 10 in parallel, shouldn't it have been 1/4.235+1/10 = 1/R = 2.975?

so then with
------3--------
| |
20 2.975
| |
------------

So now which should I combine first?
 
first take this and then you shall have the feel of the question much better..""

General rules for doing the reduction process include:

1. Two (or more) resistors with their heads directly connected together and their tails directly connected together are in parallel, and they can be reduced to one resistor using the equivalent resistance equation for resistors in parallel.

2. Two resistors connected together so that the tail of one is connected to the head of the next, with no other path for the current to take along the line connecting them, are in series and can be reduced to one equivalent resistor.

Finally, remember that for resistors in series, the current is the same for each resistor, and for resistors in parallel, the voltage is the same for each one
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top