Estimating Cooling Time of Steel Block at High Temperatures

AI Thread Summary
To estimate the cooling time of a steel block from 1000°C to 800°C in ambient air, the lumped capacitance approach is recommended, which simplifies the analysis by assuming uniform temperature throughout the block. The heat transfer equation incorporates convective heat loss, but at high temperatures, radiation becomes the dominant mode of heat transfer, necessitating adjustments to the convection coefficient. Calculating the Biot number can help validate the lumped model's accuracy, with a value significantly less than 1 indicating a good approximation. For precise modeling, a finite element or finite difference approach that includes both radiation and convection effects is advised. Ultimately, accurate cooling time estimation requires careful consideration of both convection and radiation heat transfer mechanisms.
1988ajk
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
I have a steel block (2.75m x 1.6m x 0.5m) sat at 1000°C in ambient air (22°C)

How long will it take for a surface to drop to say 800°C

should i use the heat transfer eq: Q=KA\DeltaT to find the power in joules per second, then transpose to find seconds somehow?

Any help will be appreciated

Adam.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi Adam. Your block sitting in open air is undergoing convective heat transfer. For transient analysis of this type, you'll need to use the lumped capacitance approach. We ignore the temperature gradient inside the block and assume that the entire block is at the same temperature. Then, with an energy balance, we equate the rate of heat transfer out of the block (convection) to the rate of change in internal energy of the block.

-\dot{E}_{out} = \dot{E}_{st}

Then:

-hA_{s}(T - T_{\infty}) = \rho Vc\dfrac{dT}{dt}

With a bunch of exciting math, we can arrive at:

\dfrac{\rho Vc}{hA_{s}} \ln\dfrac{T - T_{\infty}}{T_{i} - T_{\infty}} = t

Where:

<br /> <br /> \rho = \text{material density} \\<br /> V = \text{volume} \\<br /> c = \text{specific heat capacity} \\<br /> h = \text{convective heat transfer coefficient} \\<br /> A_{s} = \text{surface area exposed to the air} \\<br /> T = \text{final temperature} \\<br /> T_{i} = \text{initial temperature} \\<br /> T_{\infty} = \text{temperature of the air} \\<br /> t = \text{time taken to cool from } T_{i} \text{ to } T \text{ in seconds}\\<br /> <br />

At this point, consult some references to determine the specific heat capacity and the convective heat transfer coefficient, and then it's plug and chug. Watch out for units!

According to my reference here:

<br /> <br /> c_{steel} = \text{440 } \dfrac{\text{J}}{\text{kg}\cdot{\text{K}}} \\<br /> h_{air} = \text{20} \dfrac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^{2}\cdot{\text{K}}} <br /> <br />


Note
********************


Keep in mind this is an approximation because we are assuming the gradient in the block has no effect on the rate of cooling (although most likely good enough for your needs). A measure of the validity of the approximation can be found through calculating the Biot number.

<br /> <br /> Bi = \dfrac{hL_{c}}{k}\\<br /> <br /> \text{Where:} \\<br /> <br /> L_{c} = \dfrac{V}{A_{s}} = \text{characteristic length} \\<br /> k = \text{thermal conductivity of the material} \\<br /> <br />

For a good approximation, Bi should be much less than 1.

Hope that helps!
 
You have a bit more of a problem here. The block is at 1000 C. Therefore radiation is the dominant heat transfer mode. Natural convection is dwarfed by radiation at these temperatures. My advice is to create a FE for FD model of it and include the radiation boundary condition along with the natural comvection condition.

If you cannot do this you can approximate the effect of radiation and lump it into the convection coefficient. It's crude but better than ignoring the major heat loss.
 
If you got access to the ford automobile factory in detroit, you might be able to measure this in real life.

Last time I was there, I remember red hot ingots emerging from where they were made and them sitting (still red) before they were moved to where they would be worked.
 
Assuming the block to be lumped, you can equate convection loss + radiation loss to heat term at steady state.
 
Due to its nonlinearity you'll have to perform a numerical integration in order to solve it. Newton Raphson embedded in a fully implicit scheme would work well.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top