Estimating Error in Wavelength from Graphical Approach

In summary, the article discusses a method for estimating errors in wavelength measurements using a graphical approach. It emphasizes the importance of visual representation in analyzing data, allowing for clearer identification of uncertainties and trends. The methodology involves plotting data points and fitting a curve to them, enabling the calculation of error margins based on the spread of values. This approach not only enhances accuracy in wavelength estimation but also aids in understanding the overall precision of experimental results.
  • #1
PhysicsRock
117
18
Homework Statement
/
Relevant Equations
/
As part of my studies, I'm obliged to take an experimental course at the moment, where I have to conduct experiments and write a composition. Today we examined spectral lines of helium with a prism. As part of the evaluation, I had to plot the measured diffraction angles of different colors / wavelengths (which were unknown at the time and left to figure out later) as function of ##\lambda##. Now I'm asked to estimate the error in the wavelength from the graphical approach, but I have no idea where to start. There's no expression for the dependence of ##\delta(\lambda)## on ##\lambda##, so I can't really do the classical

$$
\Delta \delta = \left\vert \frac{d \delta(\lambda)}{d \lambda} \right\vert \Delta \lambda \Leftrightarrow \Delta \lambda = \left\vert \frac{d \delta(\lambda)}{d\lambda} \right\vert^{-1} \Delta \delta
$$

What I thought of is to try to draw a tangent line as good as possible at a measured wavelength, say ##\lambda_0##, and read off its slope. That would sort of act like ##\delta^\prime(\lambda_0)## and I could calculate an error. However, I don't like two things about that. The first is that the error I get for the value that's off the most (by about ##12.3 \, \text{nm}##) is too little at about ##\Delta \lambda \approx 5.56 \, \text{nm}##. Second, it just seems too easy to me.

I hope some of you have a suggestion for a good approach. Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
PhysicsRock said:
Homework Statement: /
Relevant Equations: /

Today we examined spectral lines of helium with a prism. As part of the evaluation, I had to plot the measured diffraction angles of different colors / wavelengths (which were unknown at the time and left to figure out later) as function of wavelength lambda.
Can you post screenshots of the test setup and of your data?

And how are you determining the wavelength ##\lambda## ? From the observed color and a look-up table, or do you have a way of measuring the wavelength at each angle directly?
 
  • #3
berkeman said:
Can you post screenshots of the test setup and of your data?

And how are you determining the wavelength ##\lambda## ? From the observed color and a look-up table, or do you have a way of measuring the wavelength at each angle directly?
This (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...ent_setup.svg/1200px-Experiment_setup.svg.png) setup was used. We first measured the deflection angles of the individual lines of mercury, the wave lengths were given here. After that, we were supposed to draw a diagram, putting the values of ##\delta## on the ##y##- and ##\lambda## on the ##x##-axis and marking the points where a linked pair met in the coordinate system. This gave the curve ##\delta(\lambda)## I was talking about. Then we repeated the same process for helium, but this time without being given the wave lengths. The idea was to draw a horizontal line from the measured deflection angle until it intersects ##\delta(\lambda)##, the ##x##-coordinate of that point would then give the wave length of the observed spectral line.

I hope I was able to clarify the procedure.
 
  • #4
PhysicsRock said:
Please always upload images to PF, to ensure that they are not lost in future years when the image server at some other website decides to delete them. Here is your image:

1694039876704.png

(attribution added) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Experiment_setup.svg
 
Last edited:
  • #5
PhysicsRock said:
We first measured the deflection angles of the individual lines of mercury, the wave lengths were given here.
Which what here?
 
  • #6
PhysicsRock said:
This (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...ent_setup.svg/1200px-Experiment_setup.svg.png) setup was used. We first measured the deflection angles of the individual lines of mercury, the wave lengths were given here. After that, we were supposed to draw a diagram, putting the values of ##\delta## on the ##y##- and ##\lambda## on the ##x##-axis and marking the points where a linked pair met in the coordinate system. This gave the curve ##\delta(\lambda)## I was talking about. Then we repeated the same process for helium, but this time without being given the wave lengths. The idea was to draw a horizontal line from the measured deflection angle until it intersects ##\delta(\lambda)##, the ##x##-coordinate of that point would then give the wave length of the observed spectral line.

I hope I was able to clarify the procedure.
Ok, so it is an interpolation procedure.
First consider the sources of error:
  • the given wavelengths (presumably pretty accurate)
  • the observed deflections for mercury
  • the observed deflections for helium
  • the interpolation step
For that last, are you connecting the mercury dots with straight lines or attempting a smooth curve? If you were to connect with straight lines, what angle, at worst, is made by three consecutive dots?
 
  • #7
berkeman said:
Please always upload images to PF, to ensure that they are not lost in future years when the image server at some other website decides to delete them. Here is your image:
This is a Wikimedia image. If we are going to display it here it needs to have the license and attribution set out here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Experiment_setup.svg
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #9
haruspex said:
For that last, are you connecting the mercury dots with straight lines or attempting a smooth curve? If you were to connect with straight lines, what angle, at worst, is made by three consecutive dots?
I tried my best to make it a smooth curve, connecting the individual dots.
 
  • #11
PhysicsRock said:
I tried my best to make it a smooth curve, connecting the individual dots.
ok, but can you answer my second question?
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
ok, but can you answer my second question?
Sorry for the late reply, usually I get a notification when somebody responds. I have now settled to determine the error by drawing additional horizontal lines offset from the observed angle by the estimated error and then just read the ##x##-coordinate of the intersection point and took ##\Delta\lambda = \vert \lambda_1 - \lambda_2 \vert##, where ##\lambda_1## is the original angle and ##\lambda_2## said intersection coordinate. Tedious to do, but it should do the trick.

Thank you for your help anyway. Have a good day.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman

FAQ: Estimating Error in Wavelength from Graphical Approach

What is the graphical approach to estimating error in wavelength?

The graphical approach to estimating error in wavelength involves plotting experimental data points on a graph and fitting a curve or line to these points. By analyzing the deviations of the data points from the fitted curve or line, one can estimate the uncertainty or error in the wavelength measurements.

How do I determine the best-fit line or curve for my data?

To determine the best-fit line or curve, you can use statistical methods such as least squares regression. This method minimizes the sum of the squares of the differences between the observed values and the values predicted by the line or curve. Software tools like Excel, MATLAB, or Python libraries (e.g., NumPy, SciPy) can be used to perform these calculations.

What are the common sources of error in wavelength measurements?

Common sources of error in wavelength measurements include instrumental errors (e.g., calibration issues, resolution limits), environmental factors (e.g., temperature fluctuations, vibrations), and human errors (e.g., incorrect readings, data recording mistakes). These errors can affect the accuracy and precision of the measurements, contributing to the overall uncertainty.

How can I quantify the error in wavelength from the graph?

To quantify the error in wavelength from the graph, you can calculate the standard deviation of the residuals (the differences between the observed data points and the fitted line or curve). The standard deviation provides a measure of the spread of the data points around the best-fit line, which can be used to estimate the uncertainty in the wavelength. Confidence intervals can also be constructed to provide a range within which the true wavelength likely falls.

Why is it important to estimate the error in wavelength measurements?

Estimating the error in wavelength measurements is crucial for assessing the reliability and accuracy of experimental results. Understanding the uncertainty helps in comparing results with theoretical predictions or other experimental data, and it is essential for scientific reporting and reproducibility. Accurate error estimation also aids in identifying and mitigating potential sources of error in future experiments.

Back
Top