Estimating t Dependency on Proton Separation d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lisa...
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Separation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating how the tunneling matrix element t depends on the proton separation d in a hydrogen atom. The user has derived an expression for t using the wave functions of the protons and the electron, indicating that as d decreases, t increases due to the larger exponent in the exponential function, while an increase in d results in a smaller t. The user expresses uncertainty about whether their approach is sufficient and seeks guidance on whether they need to include more specific details about the dependency of t on d, such as characterizing it as an exponential or parabolic function. They also mention the requirement to draw the integrand and use intuition, which they feel they have not adequately addressed. Overall, the user is looking for clarity on how to enhance their solution before the deadline.
Lisa...
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Knowing that the wave function of the hydrogen atom is proportional to e-r/a0, estimate how t depends on the proton proton separation d. I need just to make a drawing of the integrand and make a reasonal approximation using my intuition (no numerical methods allowed to calculat the integral.)


Homework Equations



t is the overlap tunneling matrix element, with t= - <L|VL|R>

with
L= 1s- wavefunction centered on the left proton = psi1s(L-r)
R= 1s- wavefunction centered on the right proton = psi1s(R-r)
( L or R is the position of the left or right proton, r is the position of the electron)

VL= the attractive potential of the left proton on the electron= V(L-r)


The Attempt at a Solution



I just want to know whether my solution would be sufficient to this question, or whether I would need to do some more reasoning/ calculus/ plotting of functions.

t= - <e-(L-r)/a0 | -e2/ (4*pi*e0*(L-r)) | e-(R-r)/a0>
= e2/ (4*pi*e0) * (integral taken over dr) (1/(L-r)) * e-(L-r)/a0 -(R-r)/a0

as d= | L-R |
R= L-d

so plugging that into the above equation for t gives:

t= = e2/ (4*pi*e0) * (integral taken over dr) (1/(L-r)) * e(-L+r)/a0 (-L+d +r)/a0>

When d decreases, the exponent of e gets larger , therefore t gets larger too. When d increases, the exponent of e gets smaller, therefore t gets smaller too.

Is this it? I mean, the question said I needed to draw something and use my intuition, which I obviously did not do to solve this problem, this is just reasoning. What do I need to add?

E.g. do I need to be more specific on the dependency other than 'getting bigger/ getting smaller', but say 'it behaves like an exponentially increasing function/ like a parabolic function etc'?

Thanks in advance! I really appreciate your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please, help me, I keep getting stuck on this and the question is due tomorrow.

Now I have the primitive function as the one in the attachment (with x for 'r', l for 'L' and r for 'R'). I don't know how to go further...
 

Attachments

  • Primitive.jpg
    Primitive.jpg
    3.2 KB · Views: 429
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top