Estimating the effective grammage of the galaxy

  • Thread starter Thread starter pastro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galaxy
AI Thread Summary
The effective grammage of the galaxy is estimated at about 10^-3 g/cm^2, but calculations suggest a higher value of 10^-1 g/cm^2 based on a density of 1 proton/cm^3 and a galactic radius of 15 kpc. This discrepancy raises questions about the assumptions made regarding the line of sight, which may only account for the interstellar medium (ISM). The discussion highlights the need for a proper model of galactic density to reconcile these differences. It is suggested that the original estimate might have used the thickness of the galactic disk instead of its radius, which could explain the variance. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate estimations of galactic grammage.
pastro
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I was reading a text which gives (without derivation/reference) the effective grammage along the line of sight through the disk of the galaxy as about 10^-3 g/cm^2. Is this the proper order of magnitude for the accepted value?

By my calculation, I claim the galaxy has 1 proton/cm^3 ~ 2 x 10^-24 g/cm^3 , and a radius of 15 kpc ~ 5 x 10^22 cm. I get a grammage (=density x galactic radius) of only 10^-1 g/cm^2--100 times greater than the estimate of the text. Of course, I'm assuming the line of sight only passes through ISM.

I suppose my crude estimate just isn't good enough. Technically, grammage will be the path integral of galactic density along the line of sight, but what is the proper model of galactic density? Could someone provide insight on the cause of this inconsistency? I would have though my estimate should be closer than it is.

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I suppose the author might have used the thickness of the galactic disk instead of the radius...that gets things about right...but the context where I read this number needs an upper limit, and using the thickness of the galactic disk gives a lower limit.
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
Back
Top