MHB Evaluating/Simplifying an Expression

  • Thread starter Thread starter kingzero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expression
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a mathematical expression, specifically part f, where uncertainty exists regarding the correct steps to take. A participant expresses doubt about their approach and seeks guidance on whether they are on the right track. Another participant points out that the simplification of the expression leads to \frac{4h}{h}, indicating that x + h - x simplifies to h. This clarification suggests that the expression can be further reduced, emphasizing the importance of recognizing simplifications in algebraic expressions. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the need for clear understanding in evaluating and simplifying mathematical expressions.
kingzero
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Part f. is the only expression I am unsure of what steps to take to get the correct answer.

Would anyone be willing to give me an idea?
 

Attachments

  • 20191003_180623.jpg
    20191003_180623.jpg
    5.8 KB · Views: 108
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I went ahead and tried it, but I'm still uncertain if I am on the right track.
 

Attachments

  • WIN_20191003_19_12_16_Pro.jpg
    WIN_20191003_19_12_16_Pro.jpg
    22.9 KB · Views: 114
Why did you stop at \frac{4h}{x+ h- x}? You are aware that x+ h- x= h, aren't you?
 

Thread 'Trigonometry problem of interest'

Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
View full post »
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'

Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
View full post »
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'

Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
View full post »

Similar threads

MHB Simplifying and expanding expressions
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Change of variables clarification
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Expressing any given point on plane with one unique number
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Algebraic expression simplification 2(2u+v)/u = 4(v^2-4u^2)/3u^2
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Is there a simple way to graph this transcendental expression with pi?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Simplify this expression for the period
Replies
4
Views
3K
MHB Evaluate Trig Expressions....Part 1
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Evaluate Trig Expressions....Part 2
Replies
2
Views
2K
MHB Expression sin^n(x)/(sin^n(x)+cos^n(x))
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Find an explicit formula for this n-sum problem
Replies
7
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top