Expect Momentum Problem 1.17 Griffiths: Find Expected Value & Uncertainty

  • Thread starter Thread starter matpo39
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expectation
AI Thread Summary
To find the expected value of momentum and its uncertainty for the state psi = A(a^2 - x^2) in Griffiths Problem 1.17, one can use the formulas for momentum expectation, either through the time derivative of the expected position or directly from the wave function. Both methods yield equivalent results, but integrals will reveal an odd integrand over symmetric limits, indicating that the expected momentum is zero. The uncertainty in momentum can then be calculated using the standard deviation formula. The discussion encourages attempting the problem based on these insights. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving quantum mechanics problems effectively.
matpo39
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Problem 1.17 in griffiths gives, at time t = 0, the state psi =A(a^2-x^2) for -a to a, and 0 otherwise. It asks then to find the expected value of momentum p at 0 and also the uncertainty in p. How do I do this? The only way momentum is defined is md<x>/dt, and since the state is only for time t, there seems to be no way to do this.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To determine the expectation value of the momentum you may use
\langle p \rangle = m\frac{d}{dt} \langle x \rangle
or
\langle p \rangle = \langle \Psi \mid p \mid \Psi \rangle
Note that these two are equivalent statements. In either case, when doing the integrals, notice that you always obtain an odd integrand over over symmetric limits about the origin, what does that mean? Can you guess the solution from the initial problem statement. Give it a try.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top