Expectation value and momentum for an infinite square well

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating expectation values for a particle in an infinite square well with the initial wave function Ψ(x, 0) = A x (a - x). The normalization constant A was determined to be √(30/a^5). For the expectation value of position <x>, the integral setup was confirmed to yield <x> = a/2, which aligns with the symmetry of the wave function. The momentum expectation value <p> was found to be 0, which is also considered reasonable. Lastly, the expectation value of the Hamiltonian <H> was calculated as 5h²/(ma²), reinforcing the validity of the results.
Matt Q.
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

√[/B]
A particle in an infinite square well has the initial wave function:

Ψ(x, 0) = A x ( a - x )

a) Normalize Ψ(x, 0)

b) Compute <x>, <p>, and <H> at t = 0. (Note: you cannot get <p> by differentiating <x> because you only know <x> at one instance of time)

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a, I figured out A = \sqrt{30 / a^5}

I'm sort of confused for part b. For <x>, I set up the integral like this:

\int_{0}^{a}x Ψ(x, 0)^2 dx

And got \frac{a^6 A^2}{60}, but I'm not sure if I got it right.

For <p> and <H>, I don't know how to set up these integrals. How would I set up these integrals? I don't need you to solve it for me, I just wanted to know how to set them up.

Thank you for reading and helping.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does the momentum operator look like in position space, i.e. ##p_x\psi(x) =\ldots##?
 
Matt Q. said:
For <x>, I set up the integral like this:

\int_{0}^{a}x Ψ(x, 0)^2 dx

And got \frac{a^6 A^2}{60}, but I'm not sure if I got it right.
If you plug in your result for ##A##, you get ##\langle x \rangle = \frac a2##. Given the symmetry of ##\Psi(x,0)##, does the answer seem reasonable?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
How does the momentum operator look like in position space, i.e. ##p_x\psi(x) =\ldots##?

I figured it out and got 0 for <p>. That seems reasonable right?

vela said:
If you plug in your result for ##A##, you get ##\langle x \rangle = \frac a2##. Given the symmetry of ##\Psi(x,0)##, does the answer seem reasonable?

Ah I didn't think of that. It makes sense.
 
I also figured out <H> which turns out to be ##\frac{5 h^2}{m a^2}## which seems pretty reasonable too right?
 
Matt Q. said:
I figured it out and got 0 for <p>. That seems reasonable right?
Yes.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top