Expectation value of an angular momentum with a complex exponent

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the expectation value of angular momentum with a complex exponent can be challenging due to the presence of exponential terms. The discussion highlights the use of Euler's formula and commutator relations, but participants struggle with terms like exp(L_z). A breakthrough occurs when one suggests expanding the expression using a Taylor series, leading to a simplification. By recognizing that L_z can be expressed in terms of its eigenvalues, the expectation value can be reformulated into a more manageable form. This approach effectively resolves the initial difficulties encountered in the calculation.
isochore
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Find ## \langle l, m \vert \exp((a+ bi)L_z) \vert l, m \rangle ##
Relevant Equations
## L_z \vert l, m \rangle = \hbar m \vert l, m \rangle ##
## [L_x, L_y] = i \hbar L_z ##
I am struggling to figure out how to calculate the expectation value because I am finding it hard to do something with the exponential. I tried using Euler's formula and some commutator relations, but I am always left with some term like ##\exp(L_z)## that I am not sure how to get rid of.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dr Transport said:
Taylor series for the exponent...

Ahh, not sure why I did not think of that...

So you can expand starting with the original expression ## \langle l, m \vert \exp((a+bi)L_z) \vert l, m \rangle ##, then since ##L_z = \hbar m \vert l, m \rangle## you can simply compress back into something like ## \exp (\hbar m (a+bi)) ##?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top