Experience with converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU?

  • Thread starter vifteovn
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Experience
In summary, there have been multiple cases of converting HWR reactors to LEU fuel, including the National Research Reactor in Canada, the High Flux Isotope Reactor in the United States, the Petten High Flux Reactor in the Netherlands, the BR2 research reactor in Belgium, and the SAFARI-1 research reactor in South Africa. This conversion is important for safety and security reasons and has been successfully implemented in multiple research reactors around the world.
  • #1
vifteovn
16
0
Are there any experience converting HWR initially fueled with NU to LEU, besides the National Reserch Reactor in Canada which went from NU to HEU to LEU?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
vifteovn said:
Are there any experience converting HWR initially fueled with NU to LEU, besides the National Reserch Reactor in Canada which went from NU to HEU to LEU?
I'm aware that AECL developed a CANFLEX fuel design which uses slightly enriched U. I believe enrichment was increased up to 1.6%, but I've seen comments regarding 1.8%.

KAERI (Korea) and INR, Pitesti (Romania) research institutes have studied SEU fuel.

Enrichment Effects on Spent CANDU Fuel Characteristic Parameters
Cristina Alice Margeanu, Petre Ilie and Gheorghe Olteanu
Institute for Nuclear Research, Pitesti
http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/2771/ACF1928.pdf
 
  • #3


Yes, there have been several other cases of converting high-enriched uranium (HWR) reactors to low-enriched uranium (LEU). One example is the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States, which completed the conversion in 2006. Another is the Petten High Flux Reactor in the Netherlands, which converted in 2006 as well. In addition, the BR2 research reactor in Belgium and the SAFARI-1 research reactor in South Africa have also successfully converted from HWR to LEU fuel. These conversions are part of a global effort to reduce the use of highly enriched uranium in research reactors for safety and security reasons.
 

Related to Experience with converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU?

1. How does the conversion process from HWR fueled with NU to LEU work?

The conversion process involves removing the natural uranium (NU) fuel from the heavy water reactor (HWR) and replacing it with low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. This can be done through a variety of methods, such as blending LEU with NU or using new LEU fuel elements.

2. What are the benefits of converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU?

Converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU has several benefits, including reducing the risk of nuclear proliferation by using lower enriched fuel, improving operational efficiency, and reducing the amount of radioactive waste produced.

3. Are there any challenges or limitations in the conversion process?

Yes, there can be challenges and limitations in converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU. These can include technical challenges related to the design and compatibility of the reactor, as well as financial and political considerations.

4. Has this conversion been done before and are there any successful examples?

Yes, there have been successful examples of converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU. For example, Canada has successfully converted their NRU reactor from NU to LEU fuel, and other countries such as Argentina and South Korea have also completed similar conversions.

5. What are the potential risks or concerns associated with converting HWR fueled with NU to LEU?

One potential risk is that the conversion process could impact the performance or safety of the reactor if not done properly. There may also be concerns about the cost and feasibility of the conversion, as well as potential political and regulatory challenges.

Back
Top