Exponential Integration Question

GreenPrint
1,186
0
Why is e^{\int \frac{dt}{t}} = e^{ln|t|} = t as apposed to |t|? I don't understand what happened to the absolute value operator. Thanks for any help.

I understand that e^{x}>0. Is this the justification? But I don't understand why you can't have a negative t in e^{ln|t|} because you would take the absolute value of a negative number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GreenPrint said:
Why is e^{\int \frac{dt}{t}} = e^{ln|t|} = t as apposed to |t|?
It should be |t|, as you thought.

It's possible that there is some other context that you're not including, in which t is assumed to be positive. In that case, |t| = t.
GreenPrint said:
I don't understand what happened to the absolute value operator. Thanks for any help.

I understand that e^{x}>0. Is this the justification? But I don't understand why you can't have a negative t in e^{ln|t|} because you would take the absolute value of a negative number.
 
If I had the differential equation

\frac{dy}{dt} + \frac{y}{t} = 5

Then using integration factors

y = \frac{5∫e^{\int \frac{dt}{t}}dt}{e^{\int \frac{dt}{t}}} = \frac{5∫e^{ln|t|}dt}{e^{ln|t|}} = \frac{5∫|t|dt}{|t|}

I'm unsure how to proceed without ignoring the absolute value functions but it appears ignoring them seems to be just fine for whatever reason
 
bump - went onto second page
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply . Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top