I Far off resonant Rabi oscillations in a 2 level system

Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have a simple 2 level system with the energy difference between the 2 levels, ##\Delta## and I applying a time varying electric field, transferring population from the ground level (initially populated), to the excited level (initially with zero population). The simple Hamiltonian for this is:

$$
2\pi\times\begin{pmatrix}
0 & -\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) \\
-\Omega\cos(2\pi\omega t) & \Delta
\end{pmatrix}
$$
where, in my case, the Rabi frequency of the field ##\Omega## is comparable to the energy difference between the 2 levels, ##\Delta##, but ##\omega \ll \Delta, \Omega##. So I am very off-resonant, but I have a lot of power in my field.

For some specific values relevant to my problem, I will assume: ##\Delta = 15,000## MHz, ##\Omega = 10,000## MHz, ##\omega = 35## MHz. Here is my question. When I solve the time dependent Schrodinger equation (TDSE) with this Hamiltonian, for 1 second (I see this effect in general for other times, too), I get a population in the ground state at the end of: ##0.6924873010111454##. If I do the same, but I change ##\Omega## from ##10,000## to ##10,001## I get instead ##0.4847252419701252##, which is a huge difference for a change in the electric field of only ##1/10,000##.

However, if I do the same thing but I use ##\sin(2\pi\omega t)## instead of ##\cos(2\pi\omega t)## in the Hamiltonian, the population goes from ##0.9994980316477893## to ##0.9994977756145095##. I tried other times, too, to check if this holds, true and it seems to be the case i.e. when using ##cos## the population transfer changes a lot for small changes in the electric field, relative to the ##sin## case. Is this effect real (I can't find any mistake in my code and I don't think I am missing any physics, as it's such a simple 2 level system)? And if so, why do I have this huge difference in behavior?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top