FE method, how ? (software Comsol)

  • Thread starter Thread starter trabo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comsol Method
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the plastic flow rule for large strains in continuum mechanics, specifically in the context of using Comsol software for simulations. Participants clarify that Gauss points are not the same as mesh nodes; they are internal points used for numerical integration within elements. The computation of plastic strain variables at each Gauss point involves solving a time-discretized flow rule alongside complementarity conditions. Questions arise regarding the determination of the total deformation gradient F and its dependency on boundary conditions, particularly in scenarios with prescribed displacements. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of modeling plastic behavior and the need for precise definitions in finite element analysis.
trabo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

The plastic flow rule for large strains in a continuum medium can be written as :
-\dfrac{1}{2} \Big ( \dfrac{d}{dt}(F_p^{-1} ). ^t F_p^{-1} + F_p^{-1} . ^t \dfrac{d}{dt} ( F_p^{-1} ) \Big)= \lambda F^{-1} \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \tau} F F_p^{-1} . ^t F_p^{-1}
where F_p is the plastic part of the total deformation gradient F, f the yield surface and \tau the Kirchhoff stress tensor.
According to Comsol notes, we denote M=F_p^{-1} and discretize the law by using 'variations with \Delta' :
-\dfrac{1}{2} \Big [ 2M. ^t M -M_{old} . ^t M - M . ^t M_{old} \Big ]= \lambda \Delta t F^{-1} \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \tau} FM. ^t M​
but I don't understand what is stated after. I quote :

For each Gauss point, the plastic state variables (ε_p and M, respectively) and the plastic multiplier,\Lambda =\lambda \Delta t, are computed by solving the above time-discretized flow rule together with the complementarity conditions
\Lambda \ge 0 \quad , \quad f \le 0 \quad , \quad \Lambda f = 0​
This is done as follows (Ref. 4):
1- Elastic-predictor: Try the elastic solution M= M_{old} and \Lambda=0. If this satisfies f \le 0 it is done.
2- Plastic-corrector: If the elastic solution does not work (this is f > 0), solve the nonlinear system consisting of the flow rule and the equation f=0 using a damped Newton method.

Few things I don't understand or I'm not sure of :

1/ Gauss points stand for the mesh nodes, right ?
2/ What does "For each Gauss point the plastic strain variables are computed" mean ? We have matrices that describe the body state at all his points, that is, there is not a matrix for each point of the body, so I don't understand the beginning of their sentence.
3/ The total deformation gradient F is also a variable, we don't know its value, so how the computing is done for M

Regards
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
For the third point, does F depend on the boundary conditions ? For instance, if we consider a round tensile specimen with prescribed displacement at the top and below surface and with free stress on the lateral surface, can we infer F ?
Sure, we know its impqct on points at the top and below surface, but can we infer all its components ? If the total displacement vector is known at the two outer surfaces, then yes we can know all components of F, but if only the radial displacement is prescribed, some components can not be determined
 
Last edited:
trabo said:
Few things I don't understand or I'm not sure of :

1/ Gauss points stand for the mesh nodes, right ?
2/ What does "For each Gauss point the plastic strain variables are computed" mean ? We have matrices that describe the body state at all his points, that is, there is not a matrix for each point of the body, so I don't understand the beginning of their sentence.
3/ The total deformation gradient F is also a variable, we don't know its value, so how the computing is done for M

Regards

No, the Gauss points are no the mesh nodes. The Gauss Points, or Gaussian Integration Points, are internal to the elements. More can be found here (last paragraph of the page marked 11) and http://www.colorado.edu/engineering/cas/courses.d/IFEM.d/IFEM.Ch28.d/IFEM.Ch28.pdf.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Back
Top