Feasibility of a Warm Refrigerator

  • Thread starter Thread starter rghusted
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Refrigerator
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of a "warm refrigerator" that preserves food by removing oxygen instead of lowering temperature. While the idea aims to prevent bacterial growth, it raises concerns about anaerobic bacteria, which thrive in oxygen-free environments and can produce harmful toxins like botulism. Participants highlight that canning is an existing method that effectively preserves food by sterilizing both the food and containers to eliminate bacteria. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding bacterial behavior in different environments. Ultimately, the concept of a warm refrigerator is challenged by the risks associated with anaerobic bacteria.
rghusted
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Feasibility of a "Warm Refrigerator"

I'm looking for some critical feedback on the feasibility of this concept.

As far as I'm aware, the purpose of a refrigerator is to extend the shelf life of perishable food products by lowering the environmental temperature of the food, thus slowing the growth of bacteria. Correct?

Wouldn't a more effective and efficient mechanism to preserve food be to remove oxygen from the environment thus preventing bacterial growth altogether? This could be done with a simple flame to consume the available oxygen within the sealed environment... hence a "warm refrigerator."

Of course you could still lower the temperature - I prefer my beers cold :-)

Thoughts? Comments? Thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Then you would have to worry about anaerobic bacteria growth. These bacteria thrive in oxygenless enviroments and are actually poisioned by oxygen. One of these is the one that produces the Botulism poision as a by-product.

Besides, we already have such a "warm" food preservation method. It is called "canning". In canning, however, you have to make sure that food and canning container are both sterilized by heating in order to destroy all bacteria first( to prevent the growth of the the afore mentioned anaerobic bacteria.)
 
Right you are! I guess that's why you're the mentor. And, anaerobic appears to be more toxic to humans than aerobic bacteria. Had I remembered more from my high school biology class, I would have already known the answer. Thanks for the insight.
 
I have Mass A being pulled vertically. I have Mass B on an incline that is pulling Mass A. There is a 2:1 pulley between them. The math I'm using is: FA = MA / 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If MB is greater then FA, it pulls FA up as MB moves down the incline. BUT... If I reverse the 2:1 pulley. Then the math changes to... FA = MA * 2 = ? t-force MB * SIN(of the incline degree) = ? If FA is greater then MB, it pulls MB up the incline as FA moves down. It's confusing...
Hi. I noticed that all electronic devices in my household that also tell time eventually lag behind, except the ones that get synchronized by radio signal or internet. Most of them are battery-powered, except my alarm clock (which runs slow as well). Why does none of them run too fast? Deliberate design (why)? Wrong temperature for quartz crystal? Decreasing battery voltage? Or just a coincidence?

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
9K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top