Fermi energy condensed matter exam problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the Fermi energy and Fermi wave number for a free electron gas at zero temperature. The user seeks clarification on the relationship between the density of states and the derivation process, noting that their approach yields a volume term that seems absent in the provided equations. Participants suggest that the number density of electrons, N, is crucial for dimensional consistency and recommend integrating the density of states in energy space to find the Fermi energy. The user expresses confusion about the order of derivation requested in the problem but acknowledges the validity of different approaches. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of understanding the underlying physics and mathematical relationships in condensed matter physics.
SMC
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, I am preparing a condensed matter exam and I was wondering if I could get some help on the following question from a past exam paper:

Show that for the free electron gas at zero temperature the Fermi energy is given by:

ε_{F}=\frac{\hbar^{2}}{2m}(3π^{2}N)^{2/3}

and the fermi wave number by:

k_{F}=(3π^{2}N)^{1/3}

where N is the volume density of electrons.

Homework Equations



the previous question was to derive the density of states:

D(ε) = \frac{V}{2π^{2}}(\frac{2m}{\hbar^{2}})^{3/2} ε^{1/2}

but I don't know if I have to use that or not

The Attempt at a Solution



how I would have done it is derive k_{F} from N=\frac{VK_{F}^{3}}{3π^{2}} which is obtained by saying number of electrons N is equal to volume of fermi sphere over k-space volume element (2π/L)^{3}.

and then state that the dispersion for a free electron gas is
ε(k) = \frac{\hbar^{2}k^{2}}{2m} to get fermi energy.

but this method gives a result with the V present in the equation while the equations in the question don't have the V for some reason. Also I derived wavenumber first then energy while the question asks to derive energy first then wavenumber.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SMC - I think the N in the question is the number of particles per unit volume. Otherwise their equations aren't dimensionally correct.
 
yes ok that makes sense I should of noticed that, thank you Oxvillan. but I still don't understand why it asks me to derive fermi energy before wavenumber. is there a way of deriving fermi energy without deriving wavenumber first?

or maybe the questions are just in the wrong order
 
Actually I would have done the wavenumber first too :smile:

But you can also integrate the density of states in energy space from zero to whatever the Fermi energy is and set that equal to N.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top