Find eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of an operator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the operator \(\hat T = \frac{{\hat L_z^2}}{{2I}}\). The relevant differential equation derived is \(-\frac{{\hbar^2}}{{2I}}\frac{{\partial^2}}{{\partial \varphi^2}}f = \lambda f\), leading to the characteristic equation \(\lambda + \frac{{\hbar^2}}{{2I}}\frac{{\partial^2}}{{\partial \varphi^2}} = 0\). Participants clarify that the correct form of the equation should be rearranged to \(\frac{\partial^2}{\partial \varphi^2} f = -k^2 f\), where \(k^2 = \frac{2I\lambda}{\hbar^2}\). This equation is recognized as a standard form, suggesting familiarity with solving such differential equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying and manipulating the differential equation to find solutions.
fdbjruitoirew
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\hat T = \frac{{\hat L_z^2}}{{2I}} = - \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2I}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}}

Homework Equations


Find eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of this operator

The Attempt at a Solution


It leads to the differential eqn
- \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2I}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}}f = \lambda f
it has the characteristic eqn
\lambda + \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2I}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}} = 0
then I don't know how to do the next step
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I said its a wave equation would that help?
 
then just follow the steps for solving Schrodinger eqn that was written in textbook, is it your idea?
 
No just solve it as a regular maths equation. What sort of function when differentiated twice gives you the same function multiplied by a negative constant?
 
fdbjruitoirew said:
It leads to the differential eqn
- \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2I}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}}f = \lambda f
it has the characteristic eqn
\lambda + \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2I}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {\varphi ^2}}} = 0
then I don't know how to do the next step
That's not the characteristic equation for the differential equation. For one thing, derivatives shouldn't appear in it.

If you rearrange the original differential equation slightly, you get
$$\frac{\partial ^2}{\partial \varphi^2} f = -k^2 f$$ where ##k^2 = \frac{2I\lambda}{\hbar^2}## is a constant. Surely, you've seen that kind of differential equation before.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top