MHB Find the equation of parabola with vertex (2, 1) and focus (1, -1)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the equation of a parabola with a given vertex at (2, 1) and focus at (1, -1). The initial attempt involved calculating the directrix incorrectly, leading to an erroneous equation. After guidance, the correct slope of the directrix was determined to be -1/2, allowing for the accurate formulation of its equation. The final equation of the parabola was derived as 4x^2 + y^2 - 4xy + 8x + 46y - 71 = 0. This solution highlights the importance of correctly identifying the directrix in parabola problems.
sagarsoni7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello friends. This is my first post. I am given the following problem:

Find the equation of parabola with vertex (2, 1) and focus (1, -1)

I have tried to solve this question in this way:

Since vertex is mid point of Focus and the point which touches the Directrix. From this, I calculate that point which touches the directrix and it came out to be (3, 3). From this I got equation of directrix to be y-3=0. Now let any point (x, y) on parabola. Now distance from focus to this point and the perpendicular distance of this point from directrix will be equal. From this I got the equation: x^2 - 2x -4y + 11 =0. But answer given is: 4 x^2 + y^2 - 4xy +8x+ 46y -71=0. Please tell me where is my mistake? If you have any other method to solve this question, please share. Thanks in advance.

Sagar Soni
Class 11th Student
India
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, sagarsoni7! (Wave)

I have added the problem statement to the body of your post so that it is more clear to those reading. :D

Now, I think your method is good, but you have made an error in calculating the equation of the directrix.

It will pass through the point $(3,3)$ and be perpendicular to the axis of symmetry, which will pass through the focus and the vertex. Can you find the slope of the directrix from this? And then use this slope and the point we found to determine the equation of the directrix?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello and welcome to MHB, sagarsoni7! (Wave)

I have added the problem statement to the body of your post so that it is more clear to those reading. :D

Now, I think your method is good, but you have made an error in calculating the equation of the directrix.

It will pass through the point $(3,3)$ and be perpendicular to the axis of symmetry, which will pass through the focus and the vertex. Can you find the slope of the directrix from this? And then use this slope and the point we found to determine the equation of the directrix?

Thanks mate. You were right. Now I have solved the problem.
 
For the benefit of others who might search for the solution to this type of problem, I thought I would post a method for getting the solution.

First, we find the slope $m$ of the axis of symmetry:

$$m=\frac{1-(-1)}{2-1}=2$$

Thus, the directrix, being perpendicular to the axis of symmetry will have a slope of $$-\frac{1}{2}$$

We know the directrix passes through the point $(3,3)$, and so using the point-slope formula, we can find the equation of the directrix as follows:

$$y-3=-\frac{1}{2}(x-3)$$

Arranging this in slope-intercept form, we obtain:

$$y=-\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{2}$$

Now, the parabola we are seeking will, by definition, be the locus of points equidistant from the directrix and the focus. And so using the formulas for the distance between two points and between a point and a line, we may write:

$$(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2=\frac{\left(-\frac{1}{2}x+\frac{9}{2}-y\right)^2}{\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2+1}$$

$$(x-1)^2+(y+1)^2=\frac{\left(9-x-2y\right)^2}{5}$$

$$5x^2-10x+5+5y^2+10y+5=x^2+4xy-18x+4y^2-36y+81$$

$$4x^2+y^2-4xy+8x+46y-71=0$$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top