Find the flux of a vector field

In summary, the person is asking for verification on their answer which equates a vector quantity with a scalar quantity. The person providing the feedback points out that there is a missing vector in the expression and that multiplying by ##\rho## is not solely for obtaining correct units. They suggest finding a better motivation for multiplying by ##\rho## and also note that using ##\times## in an expression for vector analysis is incorrect. The person's proposed result can also be simplified and evaluated exactly without using an approximate result.
  • #1
falyusuf
35
3
Homework Statement
Attached below.
Relevant Equations
Attached below.
Question:
1646436275383.png

Equation:
1646436289968.png


Attempt:
1646439292931.png

Can someone verify my answer?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First of all, your assertion
1647165130602.png

cannot be correct because it is equating a vector quantity with a scalar quantity (i.e., you are missing a vector in the expression). The reason to multiply by ##\rho## is also not "to get the correct units" although having the correct units is a reasonable check that you did things correctly. You could also multiply by ##z## and get the correct units but the result would be wrong. You therefore need a better motivation for multiplying by ##\rho##.

In your last expression, you should not use ##\times## like this in an expression in vector analysis but reserve it for the vector cross product. Your result may also be simplified and evaluated exactly (i.e., there is no need to use an approximate result - the result is one of the proposed answers).
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
581
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top