Find the potential gravitational and kinetic energy of a ball after 0.4 seconds

AI Thread Summary
To find the potential gravitational and kinetic energy of a 3.0 kg metal ball after falling for 0.4 seconds, the initial height of 3.5 m must be adjusted based on the distance fallen during that time. The potential energy (PE) is calculated using the height at 0.4 seconds, which is less than 3.5 m due to the fall. The kinetic energy (KE) requires the speed of the ball after 0.4 seconds, which can be determined using kinematic equations. The initial calculations provided were incorrect as they used the initial height and acceleration instead of the actual height and velocity after the fall. Understanding the effects of time on both potential and kinetic energy is crucial for accurate calculations.
Darth Poison
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 3.0 kg metal ball is held 3.5m above the ground. Find the potential gravitational and kinetic energy of the ball after it is let go and has fallen for 0.4s


Homework Equations



EK= 1/2mv^2

EP=mgh



The Attempt at a Solution



Okay I know how to find both the kinetic and potential energy, but how does the time effect it? Is there a certain equation I have to sub it in other than the ones given. Please help :)

Potential= EP=mgh
Ep=(3.0Kg)(9.8m/s^2)(3.5m)
EP= 102.9 J

Kinetic = EK=1/2mv^2
EK=1/2(3.0kg)(9.8m/s^2)
EK=14.7 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Darth Poison said:

Homework Statement



A 3.0 kg metal ball is held 3.5m above the ground. Find the potential gravitational and kinetic energy of the ball after it is let go and has fallen for 0.4s


Homework Equations



EK= 1/2mv^2

EP=mgh



The Attempt at a Solution



Okay I know how to find both the kinetic and potential energy, but how does the time effect it? Is there a certain equation I have to sub it in other than the ones given. Please help :)

Potential= EP=mgh
Ep=(3.0Kg)(9.8m/s^2)(3.5m)
EP= 102.9 J

Kinetic = EK=1/2mv^2
EK=1/2(3.0kg)(9.8m/s^2)
EK=14.7 J

It would seem you actually don't know how to find KE.

You have substituted an acceleration value in for the velocity.

The 0.4 seconds is there as in that time the object will have fallen some distance [so you won't use 3.5 in the PE formula], and will have gained some speed - the value of which you will use in the KE formula.

Normal kinematics for falling objects is used to find the distance and speed values.
 


PeterO said:
It would seem you actually don't know how to find KE.

You have substituted an acceleration value in for the velocity.

The 0.4 seconds is there as in that time the object will have fallen some distance [so you won't use 3.5 in the PE formula], and will have gained some speed - the value of which you will use in the KE formula.

Normal kinematics for falling objects is used to find the distance and speed values.



Thank you for helping me realize that, I appreciate it. :D
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'

TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
View full post »
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'

The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Hooke's Law using Potential Energy
Replies
21
Views
1K
Potential and Kinetic energy equations including drag coefficient
Replies
1
Views
1K
Conservation: Mass Dropped onto a Spring, Find the Compression
Replies
9
Views
2K
Work, Gravitational Potential and Kinetic Energy, Spacecraft
Replies
6
Views
3K
Confused about a conservation of energy problem
Replies
4
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with heat
Replies
5
Views
2K
Conservation of Energy with Gravitational Potential Energy
Replies
6
Views
2K
How Is Potential Energy Converted to Kinetic Energy in Physical Systems?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Using Orbital Energy to Calculate Velocity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Change in the Kinetic Energy of a System
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top