Find the value of the potential at the following distances

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clement
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Value
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at various distances from a uniformly charged metal sphere. The total charge is 2.00 nC, and the sphere has a radius of 20.0 cm. The potential is correctly calculated at 48.0 cm, but confusion arises for distances at and within the sphere. It is clarified that the potential does not approach infinity as distance increases, and the potential inside the sphere is not zero but rather constant. Understanding the mathematical definition of electrostatic potential is emphasized for resolving these issues.
Clement
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A total electric charge of 2.00 nC is distributed uniformly over the surface of a metal sphere with a radius of 20.0 cm. If the potential is zero at a point at infinity, find the value of the potential at the following distances from the center of the sphere.
(a) 48.0 cm
(b) 20.0 cm
(c) 12.0 cm


Homework Equations


V=(kQ)/r


The Attempt at a Solution


I got part a no problem, having difficulty with b and c
for b, when r approaches infinity, shouldn't the potential approach infinity? but infinity was not the right answer.
for c, when r is enclosed in the sphere, isn't the potential always going to be 0?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Clement said:

Homework Equations


V=(kQ)/r

Hmmm... this is the potential due to a point charge isn't it...why do you think this is also true for the uniformly charged spherical surface?


for b, when r approaches infinity, shouldn't the potential approach infinity? but infinity was not the right answer.

\frac{1}{\infty}=0\neq\infty

for c, when r is enclosed in the sphere, isn't the potential always going to be 0?

Why would you say this?...When in doubt, go back to the mathematical definition of electrostatic potential...
 
got it, thanks!
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top