Find the wingspan and sweep angle of a V-tail

  • Thread starter Thread starter gregh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airplane Angle
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the aspect ratio and sweep angle of a V-tail for a fixed-wing UAV, the user is advised to utilize the vertical and horizontal projections of the conventional tail without dividing the vertical wingspan by two. The proposed method involving trigonometry for determining the wingspan of each V-tail surface is questioned, suggesting that checking calculations against established designs is beneficial. Examples of successful aircraft with V-tails, such as the Beech Bonanza and high-performance jets, are recommended for reference. The discussion also includes a personal anecdote about flying a V-tail aircraft, adding context to the advice given. Accurate calculations and comparisons to proven designs are essential for successful UAV design.
gregh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello guys this is my fisrt post on this forum ; I can't find anywhere how to calculate the aspect ratio and sweep angle of a V-tail. in my project I have a fixed wing uav with a normal tail that has Har = 3.1 and a Var = 1.7.

following this site: " http://www.charlesriverrc.org/articles/design/markdrela_vtailsizing.htm " , I converted the area of my tail in a v-tail that has an area of 0.052m^3 for each wing and a dihedral angle of 34°.

so I thought I'd go like this: I find the wingspan in my case: Hws = 0.495m Vws = 0.250m, divide them by two and then apply some trigonometry.

ex: wingspan of the V-tail of each surface = cos (34) * (Hws / 2) + sin (56) * (Vws / 2)

Do you think this is a correct approach? Can I use the same approach to determine the sweep angle?

thanks in advance for any reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome, gregh! :cool:

I would simply use the vertical and horizontal projections of your conventional tail to dimension your new V-tail.
I see no reason to divide the vertical wingspan by two.
 
It's good idea to check your calculations against proven designs. Some examples:
Beech Bonanza
Monerai
Waiex-B
SubSonex
Cirrus Vision SF50

Depending on the configuration of your design, you may want to look at some high performance jets:
Lockheed F-117
Fouga CM 170 Magister

BTW, back in the 1970's, I did my commercial cross country in a V-tail 1947 Beech Bonanza. California to Wisconsin and back. The trip got interesting after the generator burned out in Wyoming on the return trip, and I flew the rest of the trip with the electronics turned off.
 
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and berkeman
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Back
Top