Find Time t_0 for a Beam to Not Catch Up with Earth

  • Thread starter Thread starter zardiac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Earth Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a time t_0 when a beam emitted from Earth will not catch up to an object accelerating away from Earth with uniform acceleration a. The key equation used is x(t)=c^2/a(√(1+(a^2/c^2)t^2)-1), leading to a derived expression for t that suggests a negative time interval for t_1. Participants debate the implications of this result, particularly regarding the physical interpretation of accelerating to speeds approaching light and the energy requirements for maintaining uniform acceleration. Ultimately, the consensus acknowledges the complexity of the problem, emphasizing that uniform acceleration can only be sustained relative to the moving observer, not the stationary one. Understanding the asymptotic behavior of the world line is crucial for grasping the scenario.
zardiac
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You start at t=0 at rest on Earth and accelerate with uniform acceleration a away form earth.
Find a point in time t_0 such that when a beam emitted from Earth at t>t_0won't catch up.


Homework Equations


x(t)=c^2/a(\sqrt{1+\frac{a^2}{c^2}t^2}-1)


The Attempt at a Solution


I think that light travel with velocity c. So if the beam is emitted at t=t_1 then at time t, the beam have traveled c(t-t_1). So I try to find the solution for x(t)=c(t-t_1), and I end up with the following expression for t:
t=\frac{a}{2c}\frac{t_1(2-a/c t_1)}{(a/c - a^2/c^2 t_1)}

According to this the time would be negatic in the intervall t_1=c/a and t_1=2c/a So I think in this intevall the beam won't be able to catch up, but after t_1=2c/a the time becomes positive again, which I don't know how to interpret.
Am I approaching this problem the wrong way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about it this way: will you ever accelerate to a speed greater than that of light? If not, how can you possibly outrun light?
 
Well it is problem 3.9 in D'inverno Introducing Einsteins relativity. I agree that it seem impossible but the problem statement is that if you get a large enough headstart the light won't catch up.
 
What assumptions are you supposed to make?
 
negatic?
 
You should be able to show that your world line is a hyperbola. Find its asymptotes.
 
zardiac said:
t=\frac{a}{2c}\frac{t_1(2-a/c t_1)}{(a/c - a^2/c^2 t_1)}

Note t approaches ∞ as the denominator on the right approaches 0.
 
Let's say you keep uniform acceleration a, relative to the stationary observer. After c/a time you will be moving at the speed of light. To keep uniform acceleration you need infinite amount of energy. I think the answer is c/a, just the problem is that you can't keep uniform acceleration.
 
  • #10
Myslius said:
Let's say you keep uniform acceleration a, relative to the stationary observer. After c/a time you will be moving at the speed of light. To keep uniform acceleration you need infinite amount of energy. I think the answer is c/a, just the problem is that you can't keep uniform acceleration.
You've misinterpreted the problem. The acceleration is uniform relative to the moving observer. As you noted, you can't have a uniform acceleration relative to the stationary observer indefinitely.
 
Back
Top