Find (x,y) of a Point on an Ellipse Given Foci and Radii Info

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the coordinates of a point on an ellipse given the coordinates of its foci and the sum of the distances from these foci to the point. It confirms that the total distance from any point on the ellipse to the two foci is constant and provides a method to derive the semi-major axis (a) and semi-minor axis (b) using the relationship between these distances. The conversation also touches on the need to account for the angle of the major axis relative to the x-axis. Additionally, there is an exploration of alternative methods for calculating the second radius based on right triangle principles, although some confusion arises regarding the formulation. The thread ultimately emphasizes the geometric relationships inherent in ellipse properties.
Crusty
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
expressing points on an ellipse given the (x,y) of the foci and the sum of the radii

Given the (x,y) of the 2 foci of an ellipse,
and the sum of the radii from the foci,

Is there an equation that will find the (x,y) of a point on the ellipse at a specified angle?

Is there an equation to find the (x,y) given one radius' length from a specified focus?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The total distance from a point on an ellipse to the two foci is always the same. I assume that by "sum of the radii from the foci" you mean that number. Imagine an ellipse in "standard position" (center at (0,0), major and minor axes on the x and y axes) with vertices at (a,0),(-a,0),(0,b),(0,-b) and foci at (c,0), (-c,0). Then the line from the point (0,b) to (c,0) is the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs of length b and c. The distance from (0,b) to (c,0) is \sqrt{b^2+ c^2} and so the total distance from (0,b) to both foci is 2\sqrt{b^2+ c^2}.

The disance from the focus (c,0) to the point (a, 0) is a- c, of course, and the distance from the focus (-c,0) to the point (a,0) is a-(-c)= a+ c. The total distance is (a- c)+ (a+ c)= 2a.

Since those two total distances must be the same 2a= 2\sqrt{b^2+ c^2} or a<sup>2</sup>= b<sup>2</sup>+ c<sup>2</sup>.<br /> <br /> Thus if you are given the (x,y) coordinates of the foci, c is half the distance between them. If you are also given the total distance from each point on the ellipse to the foci, a is half that distance and b can be calculated from formula above.<br /> <br /> You will still need to account for the angle the major axis makes with the x-axis but that is just the arctan of the slope of the line through the two foci.
 
Thanks
That's good. I think I was just before that point of trying those known points on the ellipse with right triangles. Sounds correct. Is there a math word for sum of radii in an ellipse?

The method you show should work and I may use it in the end. But I was checking another method too. I'll finish checking this one myself later when I have more time, but in the mean time if you catch this would you mind correcting it?

2nd radius = ( sqrt( (distance between foci)^2 + ( (sum of radii) - (2nd radius) )^2 )

um, how do you get the 2 instancies of (2nd radius) to the same side of the equation?

2nd radius = ( (distance between foci) / (sum of radii) + (sum of radii)
) / 2

arg those two (sum of radii) don't look right...

It was based on a right triangle with both foci as points and the right angle at the 1st focus, rather than at the mid point. So if it works for that, I'd still need to check if it would work for other angles...
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top