Finding Magnetic Field Solutions for a Current-Carrying Cylinder?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding magnetic field solutions for a current-carrying cylinder with a non-constant current density. The total current, I_0, is determined by integrating the current density over the cylinder's cross-section. Participants clarify the integration process, emphasizing the need to consider elemental areas for accurate calculations. The correct approach involves using Ampere's law to derive expressions for the magnetic field both inside and outside the cylinder. The conversation concludes with confirmation that the problems have been resolved successfully.
adrian116
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
the question is that:

A long, straight, solid cylinder, oriented with its axis in the z-direction, carries a current whose current density is \vec J. The current density, although symmetrical about the cylinder axis, is not constant but varies according to the relation

(the relation is in the attachment)

where a is the radius of the cylinder, r is the radial distance from the cylider axis, and I_0 is a constant haveing units of amperes.
a) show that I_0 is the total current passing through the entire cross section of the wire.
b). Using Ampere's law, derive an expression for the magnitude of the magnetic field \vec B in the region r>=a .
c). Obtain an expression for the current I contained in a circular cross section of radius r<=a and centered at the cylinder axis.
d). Using Ampere's law, derive an expression for the magnitude of the magnetic field \vec B in the region r<=a.


For a, Since for the entire cross section of the wire, i subt. r=a into the relation. But it will give zero. I shown nothing. If I subt. J=I/A,
then I=2 I_0 [1- (\frac{r}{a})^2]. Anything wrong,
and how to proof that?
 

Attachments

  • relation.jpg
    relation.jpg
    5.3 KB · Views: 952
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the current density is not constant, you need to integrate over the cross section.

Also, have you taken a look at the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997"l? If you post the question that way, you won't need to wait till the attachment is approved.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
i am sorry since i do not familiar that tutorial yet...

Should i integrate \frac{2 I_0}{\pi a^2} [1- (\frac{dr}{a})^2]
from 0 to a? if yes, how to integerate (dr)^2
 
Last edited:
adrian116 said:
i am sorry since i do not familiar that tutorial yet...

Should i integrate \frac{2 I_0}{\pi a^2} [1- (\frac{dr}{a})^2]
from 0 to a? if yes, how to integerate (dr)^2

No, that's completely wrong.

If you take a small elemental area da, then the current which flows through that bit is \vec{J}.\vec{da}

To find the net current through the whole wire, in a sense you add up the current through all the small elemental areas.
So your net current will be

I=\int \vec{J}.\vec{da}

Now,
(i) Can you tell me what elemental area you will take?
(ii) What will the limits of integration be?
 
Last edited:
elemental area is the small cross section area dA=2 \pi r da,
and the limits of integration is from 0 to a?
 
Last edited:
I have got the ans.
and the following problems are also be solved,
thank you so much
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top