Finding Momentum and Uncertainty in Quantum Mechanics Problem 1.17

AI Thread Summary
Problem 1.17 in Griffiths presents a wave function defined for a specific range and asks for the expected momentum and its uncertainty at time t=0. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the calculation of momentum since it is typically defined through time evolution, which seems absent in this case. A participant suggests that a Fourier transform of the wave function could yield the expected momentum, though they doubt this aligns with the problem's intent. The conversation reflects a mix of frustration and humor as participants navigate the complexities of quantum mechanics. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding a straightforward approach to solve the problem without resorting to Fourier transforms.
asdf60
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Problem 1.17 in griffiths gives, at time t = 0, the state psi =A(a^2-x^2) for -a to a, and 0 otherwise. It asks then to find the expected value of momentum p at 0 and also the uncertainty in p. How do I do this? The only way momentum is defined is md<x>/dt, and since the state is only for time t, there seems to be no way to do this.

I know that if i take Fourier transform the wave function i'll get the expected momentum, but I don't think that's what the problem wants me to do. Is there a simpler way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
never mind, I'm an idiot.
 
Glad we could help. :biggrin:
 
Tom Mattson said:
Glad we could help. :biggrin:
:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top