MHB Finding Orbit Type with Energy Equation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the type of orbit using the energy equation, the formula E = v²/2 - μ/r is applied, where μ = G(m1 + m2). The values for position and velocity vectors are provided, allowing the calculation of the specific energy E. It is established that E = 0 indicates a parabolic orbit, E > 0 indicates a hyperbolic orbit, and E < 0 indicates an elliptical orbit, with circular orbits occurring when v²r = μ. A confusion arose regarding the inclusion of the mass term in the kinetic energy component and the derivation of μ. Clarification on μ allowed for successful application of the energy equation to find the orbit type.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.
 
Ackbach said:
As I understand it, $E=0$ is parabolic, $E>0$ is hyperbolic, and $E<0$ is elliptic. If $v^{2}r=\mu$, then it's circular.

My issue was I didn't have a mu term.
 
dwsmith said:
How does one use the energy equation to determine the type of orbit?
$$
E = \frac{v^2}{2} - \frac{\mu}{r}
$$
where $\mu = G(m_1+m_2)$ and
$$
\mathbf{r} = \begin{pmatrix}
-4069.503\\
2861.786\\
4483.608
\end{pmatrix}\text{km},\quad
\mathbf{v} = \begin{pmatrix}
-5.114\\
-5.691\\
-1.000
\end{pmatrix}\text{km/sec}
$$
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I'm confused about two things:
1. You are missing an "m" from the kinetic energy term.

2. You defined \mu in your original post. Is this a result you are supposed to derive perhaps?

-Dan

Later on I was told what mu is for this problem so I was able to do it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Back
Top