MHB Finding the Counter Clockwise Angle of Vector Difference B-A with the +x Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter ashcash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trig Vectors
AI Thread Summary
To find the counterclockwise angle of the vector difference B-A with the +x axis, the correct approach involves using the tangent function with the components 2.77 and -5.95. The calculation should be tan(θ) = 5.95/2.77, leading to θ ≈ 65 degrees when using the inverse tangent. It's important to ensure that the calculator is set to degrees, not radians, to avoid confusion. The discussion clarifies that the signs of the components can be adjusted based on the quadrant, confirming that the vector indeed lies in the first quadrant after correcting the direction of vector A.
ashcash
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a question on finding the counter clockwise angle the vector difference B-A makes with the +x axis
I already have the components of vector difference for B-A and I have checked that they are correct they are 2.77,-5.95
I started with doing the tan function (opp/adj) which was -5.95/2.77
I got -2.148 which I found the tan(-2.148) to be -1.536
I then found the arctan to be 56.934
I then subtracted 360-56.93 and got an answer to be 303.07
This proved to be wrong and I am wondering if someone could help find where my mistake is.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I find that your question is a bit unclear, do you have the original question?

You got $2.77$ and $-5.95$; are those the lengths of the $x$ and $y$ components of the vector respectively?

$$\tan\left({\theta}\right)=\frac{5.95}{2.77}$$

I do not get $\theta$ the be $57$ degrees.
 
Sorry for the confusing question, the question word for word is
"Find the counterclockwise angle the vector difference B⃗ −A⃗ makes with the +x axis."
2.77 is for B and -5.95 is for A
So my math must be off, I am assuming I went wrong getting
tan(θ)=-5.95/2.77
First I took what I got from dividing the two which was -2.148, and plugged it in my calculator and like this (tan -2.148) and got 1.536
then I do arctan(1.536) am I right?
 
I see your mistake now.

For all intents and purposes, the signs don't don't matter since we're dealing with magnitudes here. We can just adjust accordingly depending on what quadrant we are on.

$$\tan\left({\theta}\right)=\frac{5.95}{2.77}$$

Theta is computed by the inverse tangent:

$$\tan^{-1}\left({\frac{5.95}{2.77}}\right)\approx65 \text{ degrees}$$

If your calculator is on radians, use the conversion factor $\frac{180}{\pi}$

- - - Updated - - -

Notice, however, that your question wants $\vec{B-A}$, so we need to flip the vector $\vec{A}$ in the opposite directions. Therefore, the vector lies on the first quadrant.
 
I understand my mistake now!
Thank you so much!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top