Finding the Electrical Field from the Electric Potential

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field from the given electric potential V = 210x^2 - 270y^2, the correct approach involves calculating the negative gradient of the potential. The electric field E can be determined using the formula E = -∇V, which requires taking partial derivatives of V with respect to x and y. The user initially calculated V at the point (3m, 1m) but arrived at an incorrect value of -200 Volts. Clarification is needed on how to properly compute the gradient using partial derivatives to find the correct electric field at the specified coordinates. Understanding the gradient operation is crucial for solving the problem accurately.
Gramma2005
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am trying to solve this problem:

The electric potential in a region of space is V = 210x^2 - 270y^2, where x and y are in meters. Find the E-field at (3m, 1m)

So I started with:

E = \frac{V}{d}

so then I plugged x and y into the electric potential equation and got

V= -200 Volts

Then I multiplied it by the distance d=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}

Unfortunately this is not the right answer. Perhaps someone could show me where I went wrong

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\vec{E}=-\vec{gradV}
 
what is \vec{gradV}?
 
If you used partial derivatives that would help you out.
 
\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla}V\vec{\nabla} \equiv \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \hat{\mathbf{x}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial y} \hat{\mathbf{y}} + \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \hat{\mathbf{z}}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top